仅事实
家庭起诉特斯拉，指控Cybertruck车门设计致死事故
摘要
加利福尼亚皮埃蒙特2024年一场致命的Cybertruck车祸中，两名遇难者的家属对特斯拉提起诉讼，称该车的电子车门设计在火灾时阻碍了逃生。
2024年11月，一辆特斯拉Cybertruck在加利福尼亚皮埃蒙特发生车祸，导致三名大学生死亡。两名遇难者克里斯塔·塚原（Krysta Tsukahara）和杰克·尼尔森（Jack Nelson）的家属对特斯拉提起诉讼，指控该车的电子车门设计阻止了车内人员在随后的火灾中逃生。
诉讼称，Cybertruck依赖电子车门机制，且缺乏可操作的手动解锁装置，导致乘客在事故后被困车内。家属们认为，特斯拉明知电子车门存在潜在危险，却仍继续销售采用该设计的车辆。他们引用了多起向美国国家公路交通安全管理局（NHTSA）提交的投诉，警告后排乘客在紧急情况下可能被困。
塚原家属表示，他们的女儿在事故后仍然活着，但因车门设计无法逃脱，认为她的死亡本可避免。同样，尼尔森家属强调，他们的儿子事故后也仍然存活，但因被困车内吸入浓烟并遭受烧伤而不幸身亡。
诉讼还提及2013年特斯拉首席执行官埃隆·马斯克在一次财报电话会议上承认车门传感器存在故障，导致车门无法开启。尽管特斯拉曾保证问题已解决，但诉讼指出故障仍在继续，引用了超过30起客户投诉称车门拒绝开启。
此次诉讼加剧了外界对特斯拉车辆设计的审视，特别是关于安全功能和紧急逃生机制方面的关注。
事实核查
使用外部来源和数据库核实文章的事实。
✓
Confirmed
In November 2024, a Tesla Cybertruck crashed in Piedmont, California, resulting in the deaths of three college students.
✓
Confirmed
The families of two victims, Krysta Tsukahara and Jack Nelson, have filed lawsuits against Tesla, alleging that the vehicle's electronic door design prevented the occupants from escaping the ensuing fire.
✓
Confirmed
The lawsuits claim that the Cybertruck's reliance on electronic door mechanisms, without accessible manual overrides, trapped the passengers inside after the crash.
✓
Confirmed
The families argue that Tesla was aware of the potential dangers associated with electronic doors but continued to market vehicles with this design.
✓
Confirmed
They cite multiple complaints to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) warning that rear-seat passengers could be trapped during emergencies.
✓
Confirmed
The Tsukaharas stated that their daughter's death was preventable, emphasizing that she was alive after the crash but unable to escape due to the door design.
✓
Confirmed
Similarly, the Nelsons highlighted that their son was also alive post-crash but succumbed to smoke inhalation and burns after being trapped inside.
✓
Confirmed