仅事实
联邦上诉法院裁定特朗普关税违法，称权力越界
摘要
联邦上诉法院裁定特朗普总统的广泛关税非法，指出只有国会有权征收此类税费。
联邦上诉法院裁定特朗普总统大规模关税违法，强调征收此类关税的权力仅属于国会。联邦巡回上诉法院以7比4的判决认定，1977年《国际紧急经济权力法》（IEEPA）并未赋予总统实施大规模关税的权力。
法院指出，“征收关税等税费的核心国会权力，依据宪法专属于立法部门。”
对此，特朗普总统批评该判决“高度党派化”，并宣布计划向美国最高法院上诉。他强调，在上诉过程中，关税仍将继续执行。
该判决为政府的贸易政策带来不确定性，可能影响现有关税及未来贸易谈判。法律专家表示，如果最高法院维持该判决，政府可能需要探索其他法律途径征收关税，这些途径可能更为有限。
该裁决还引发了对美国财政潜在影响的质疑，因政府可能需要退还依据现已无效措施征收的关税。
随着法律程序的推进，政府单方面征收关税的能力仍存疑问，可能影响持续的贸易关系和经济政策。
来源
CNBC事实核查
使用外部来源和数据库核实文章的事实。
✓
Confirmed
A federal appeals court has determined that President Donald Trump's extensive tariffs are unlawful.
✓
Confirmed
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, in a 7-4 decision, found that the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not grant the president the power to implement sweeping tariffs.
✓
Confirmed
The court stated, 'The core Congressional power to impose taxes such as tariffs is vested exclusively in the legislative branch by the Constitution.'
✓
Confirmed
In response, President Trump criticized the ruling as 'highly partisan' and announced plans to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.
!
Partly Confirmed
The ruling has introduced uncertainty into the administration's trade policy, with potential implications for existing tariffs and future trade negotiations.
!
Partly Confirmed
Legal experts suggest that if the Supreme Court upholds the decision, the administration may need to explore alternative legal avenues to impose tariffs, which could be more restrictive.
✓
Confirmed
The decision also raises questions about the potential financial impact on the U.S. Treasury, as the government may be required to refund tariffs collected under the now-invalidated measures.
✓
Confirmed