Negocios

2 de septiembre de 2025

Resumen

Un tribunal federal de apelaciones ha dictaminado que los amplios aranceles del presidente Trump son ilegales, afirmando que solo el Congreso tiene la autoridad para imponer tales gravámenes.

Un tribunal federal de apelaciones ha determinado que los extensos aranceles del presidente Donald Trump son ilegales, afirmando que la autoridad para imponer tales gravámenes reside únicamente en el Congreso. El Tribunal de Apelaciones de los Estados Unidos para el Circuito Federal, en una decisión de 7-4, concluyó que la Ley de Poderes Económicos de Emergencia Internacional de 1977 (IEEPA, por sus siglas en inglés) no otorga al presidente el poder de implementar aranceles generales.

El tribunal declaró: "El poder fundamental del Congreso para imponer impuestos como los aranceles está conferido exclusivamente a la rama legislativa por la Constitución."

En respuesta, el presidente Trump criticó el fallo como "altamente partidista" y anunció planes para apelar ante la Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos. Enfatizó que los aranceles permanecen vigentes durante el proceso de apelación.

El fallo ha introducido incertidumbre en la política comercial de la administración, con posibles implicaciones para los aranceles existentes y futuras negociaciones comerciales. Expertos legales sugieren que si la Corte Suprema confirma la decisión, la administración podría necesitar explorar vías legales alternativas para imponer aranceles, las cuales podrían ser más restrictivas.

La decisión también plantea interrogantes sobre el posible impacto financiero en el Tesoro de los Estados Unidos, ya que el gobierno podría verse obligado a reembolsar los aranceles recaudados bajo las medidas ahora invalidadas.

A medida que continúan los procedimientos legales, la capacidad de la administración para imponer aranceles unilateralmente sigue siendo cuestionada, lo que podría afectar las relaciones comerciales en curso y la política económica.

Fuente

CNBC

Noticias relacionadas

Treasury yields move lower after Fed kicks off hiking cycle

17 de septiembre de 2026 • CNBC

Verificación de hechos

Verifique los hechos del artículo utilizando fuentes y bases de datos externas.

✓

Confirmed

A federal appeals court has determined that President Donald Trump's extensive tariffs are unlawful.

✓

Confirmed

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, in a 7-4 decision, found that the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not grant the president the power to implement sweeping tariffs.

✓

Confirmed

The court stated, 'The core Congressional power to impose taxes such as tariffs is vested exclusively in the legislative branch by the Constitution.'

✓

Confirmed

In response, President Trump criticized the ruling as 'highly partisan' and announced plans to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.

!

Partly Confirmed

The ruling has introduced uncertainty into the administration's trade policy, with potential implications for existing tariffs and future trade negotiations.

!

Partly Confirmed

Legal experts suggest that if the Supreme Court upholds the decision, the administration may need to explore alternative legal avenues to impose tariffs, which could be more restrictive.

✓

Confirmed

The decision also raises questions about the potential financial impact on the U.S. Treasury, as the government may be required to refund tariffs collected under the now-invalidated measures.

✓

Confirmed

Tribunal Federal de Apelaciones Dictamina en Contra de los Aranceles de Trump, Citando Exceso de Poder

Fuente

Noticias relacionadas

Treasury yields move lower after Fed kicks off hiking cycle

Verificación de hechos

A federal appeals court has determined that President Donald Trump's extensive tariffs are unlawful.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, in a 7-4 decision, found that the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not grant the president the power to implement sweeping tariffs.

The court stated, 'The core Congressional power to impose taxes such as tariffs is vested exclusively in the legislative branch by the Constitution.'

In response, President Trump criticized the ruling as 'highly partisan' and announced plans to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.

The ruling has introduced uncertainty into the administration's trade policy, with potential implications for existing tariffs and future trade negotiations.

Legal experts suggest that if the Supreme Court upholds the decision, the administration may need to explore alternative legal avenues to impose tariffs, which could be more restrictive.

The decision also raises questions about the potential financial impact on the U.S. Treasury, as the government may be required to refund tariffs collected under the now-invalidated measures.

As the legal proceedings continue, the administration's ability to unilaterally impose tariffs remains in question.

Sigue leyendo, gratis

Sigue leyendo, gratis

Fuente

Noticias relacionadas

Treasury yields move lower after Fed kicks off hiking cycle

Verificación de hechos

A federal appeals court has determined that President Donald Trump's extensive tariffs are unlawful.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, in a 7-4 decision, found that the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not grant the president the power to implement sweeping tariffs.

The court stated, 'The core Congressional power to impose taxes such as tariffs is vested exclusively in the legislative branch by the Constitution.'

In response, President Trump criticized the ruling as 'highly partisan' and announced plans to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.

The ruling has introduced uncertainty into the administration's trade policy, with potential implications for existing tariffs and future trade negotiations.

Legal experts suggest that if the Supreme Court upholds the decision, the administration may need to explore alternative legal avenues to impose tariffs, which could be more restrictive.

The decision also raises questions about the potential financial impact on the U.S. Treasury, as the government may be required to refund tariffs collected under the now-invalidated measures.

As the legal proceedings continue, the administration's ability to unilaterally impose tariffs remains in question.

Sigue leyendo, gratis

Sigue leyendo, gratis

Razones de manipulación

Emociones eliminadas

Tendencia política

Credibilidad