联邦雇员起诉教育部,指控带有党派色彩的电子邮件信息
仅事实

联邦雇员起诉教育部,指控带有党派色彩的电子邮件信息

摘要

一联邦工人工会对教育部提起诉讼,指控未经员工同意修改其自动回复邮件,加入指责民主党导致政府停摆的党派语言。

一联邦工人工会已对教育部提起法律诉讼,指控未经员工同意修改其自动回复邮件,加入将政府停摆归咎于民主党的党派语言。该诉讼由美国联邦政府雇员工会在华盛顿特区提起,称此举违反了联邦雇员的第一修正案权利,强迫他们传达政治信息。

诉状中写道:“强迫公务员代表政治领导层的党派议程发声,公然侵犯了联邦雇员的第一修正案权利。”

自2025年10月1日开始的停摆期间,多部门机构网站及发给联邦雇员的电子邮件中,将责任归咎于国会民主党,有时甚至指责“激进左派”导致拨款中断。值得注意的是,许多教育部员工发现其自动回复邮件被修改,加入了如下内容:“感谢您联系我。2025年9月19日,众议院通过了H.R. 5371号法案,一项纯粹的继续拨款决议。不幸的是,民主党参议员阻挠该法案在参议院的通过,导致拨款中断。由于拨款中断,我目前处于休假状态。政府职能恢复后,我将回复邮件。”

员工反映,这些信息是在他们不知情或未同意的情况下插入的,与部门此前提供的标准语言不同。一些试图更改自动回复的员工发现党派语言被重新添加。

诉讼将教育部及部长琳达·麦克马洪列为被告,认为强制言论侵犯了宪法权利。针对诉讼的询问,教育部新闻团队回复了相同的自动回复邮件。在诉讼提交前,通讯副助理部长马迪·比德曼表示:“该邮件提醒联系教育部员工的人,我们无法回复,因为参议院民主党人拒绝投票通过纯粹的继续拨款决议并为政府提供资金。哪里有谎言?”

政府伦理专家对联邦机构通讯中包含明显政治信息表示担忧,认为可能违反了限制公务员政治活动的《哈奇法案》。律师事务所Tully Rinckey合伙人迈克尔·法林斯指出:“《哈奇法案》禁止在官方身份下参与政治活动,包括含有反对某政党的倡导性沟通。这里,单独提及民主党可能不构成违规,但明确将停摆归咎于民主党及‘激进左派’的说法可能构成违规。”

此外,加利福尼亚州众议员罗伯特·加西亚已请求美国特别顾问办公室调查政府利用机构通讯推广党派议程的行为。特别顾问办公室目前因停摆而关闭。

此次诉讼是对政府在停摆期间使用党派信息进行通讯的首次法律挑战,凸显了对联邦机构政治化的持续担忧。

来源

NPR

事实核查

使用外部来源和数据库核实文章的事实。

✓
Confirmed

A federal workers union has initiated legal action against the Department of Education, alleging that employees' out-of-office email messages were altered without their consent to include partisan language attributing the government shutdown to Democrats.

✓
Confirmed

The lawsuit contends that this action violates federal employees' First Amendment rights by compelling them to convey a political message.

✓
Confirmed

During the shutdown that began on October 1, messages on agency websites and emails to federal workers across multiple departments blamed congressional Democrats and, in some instances, the 'Radical Left' for the lapse in appropriations.

✓
Confirmed

Notably, many Department of Education employees discovered that their out-of-office replies had been modified to include statements blaming Democrat Senators for the shutdown.

✓
Confirmed

Employees reported that these messages were inserted without their knowledge or consent, differing from the model language previously provided by the department.

✓
Confirmed

Some staffers who attempted to change their out-of-office messages found that the partisan language was reinstated.

✓
Confirmed

The lawsuit names the Department of Education and Secretary Linda McMahon as defendants, arguing that the compelled speech infringes upon constitutional rights.

✓
Confirmed

Government ethics experts have raised concerns that the inclusion of overtly political messages in federal agency communications may violate the Hatch Act, which restricts political activity by civil servants.

继续阅读——免费

创建免费账户以关注新闻。无需银行卡。