Supreme Court Blocks Trump's National Guard Deployment in Illinois
Select a version of the text written from a presumed ideological perspective. This is not the original text, but a hypothetical version — how someone with that viewpoint might have phrased it. Tapping the current version again will return to the original or select cleaned version.
The U.S. Supreme Court has denied President Trump's request to deploy National Guard troops in Illinois, upholding lower court decisions that blocked the deployment.
The U.S. Supreme Court has denied President Donald Trump's request to deploy National Guard troops in Illinois, upholding lower court decisions that blocked the deployment. The administration had sought to federalize the National Guard to address violence against federal immigration agents in the Chicago area. However, both a district court and the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against the administration, stating that the protests did not constitute a "rebellion or danger of rebellion" that would justify such action.
In its brief opinion, the Supreme Court majority wrote, "At this preliminary stage, the Government has failed to identify a source of authority that would allow the military to execute the laws in Illinois." The court noted that the president did not invoke a statute providing an exception to the Posse Comitatus Act, which limits the military's role in domestic law enforcement.
Justices Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, and Neil Gorsuch dissented, arguing that the court overstepped its authority by addressing the broader issue of the National Guard's legal deployment rather than the narrower question presented. Justice Brett Kavanaugh concurred with the majority but expressed openness to granting the president more authority in future circumstances.
Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul praised the ruling, stating that the limited circumstances under which the federal government can call up the militia over a state's objection do not exist in Illinois. The White House did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
This decision marks a rare judicial setback for President Trump, who has generally seen success in emergency appeals since returning to office. The ruling may have implications for ongoing lawsuits challenging troop deployments in other Democratic-led cities.
Source
NPRFact-checking
Fact-check the facts of the article using external sources and databases.