仅事实
第九巡回上诉法院将重新审理关于国民警卫队部署波特兰的案件
摘要
第九巡回上诉法院已撤销此前的裁决，将重新审理关于俄勒冈国民警卫队联邦化部署波特兰的案件。
第九巡回上诉法院已撤销其早前允许俄勒冈国民警卫队联邦化部署波特兰的决定。法院宣布将由包括11名法官的全体合议庭重新审理此案，以重新评估总统在此事中的权限。
此举恢复了美国地方法官卡琳·伊默古特颁布的临时禁令，该禁令此前阻止了俄勒冈国民警卫队的联邦化。俄勒冈州总检察长丹·雷菲尔德对该决定发表评论称：“法院传递了一个明确信号：总统不能无故将军队派入美国城市。随着案件的推进和我们在法庭上的持续斗争，我们将继续捍卫俄勒冈的法律、价值观和主权。”
该案件聚焦于特朗普政府试图部署国民警卫队部队到波特兰以保护联邦财产，期间持续发生抗议活动。政府方面认为部署是保护联邦设施的必要措施，而州和地方官员则认为此类联邦干预侵犯了州主权且无正当理由。
此次全体合议庭重新审理将由第九巡回上诉法院的11名法官组成，他们将重新审议提交的法律论点和证据。此次复审的结果可能对联邦与州政府在美国境内部署军事力量的权力平衡产生重大影响。
随着法律程序的继续，临时禁令仍然有效，阻止了俄勒冈国民警卫队的联邦化及部署到波特兰。全体合议庭复审的具体时间尚未确定，但法院决定重新审理此案凸显了相关问题的复杂性和重要性。
事实核查
使用外部来源和数据库核实文章的事实。
✓
Confirmed
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has vacated its earlier decision that permitted the federalization of the Oregon National Guard for deployment in Portland.
✓
Confirmed
The court announced it will rehear the case en banc, involving an 11-judge panel, to reassess the president's authority in this matter.
✓
Confirmed
This development reinstates the temporary restraining order issued by U.S. District Judge Karin Immergut, which had previously blocked the federalization of the Oregon National Guard.
✓
Confirmed
Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield commented on the decision, stating, 'The court is sending a clear message: the president cannot send the military into U.S. cities unnecessarily. We will continue defending Oregon’s laws, values, and sovereignty as this case moves forward and our fight continues in the courts.'
✓
Confirmed
The case centers on the Trump administration's attempt to deploy National Guard troops to Portland to protect federal property amid ongoing protests.
✓
Confirmed
The administration argues that the deployment is necessary to safeguard federal facilities, while state and local officials contend that such federal intervention infringes upon state sovereignty and is unwarranted.
✓
Confirmed
The en banc rehearing will involve a panel of 11 judges from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, who will reconsider the legal arguments and evidence presented.
✓
Confirmed