仅事实
第九巡回上诉法院审查联邦政府在波特兰部署国民警卫队的权限
摘要
第九巡回上诉法院正在评估特朗普总统向波特兰部署国民警卫队的合法性，法官们对联邦权力与地方控制权表达了不同看法。
美国第九巡回上诉法院目前正在审查特朗普总统决定向俄勒冈州波特兰部署国民警卫队的合法性。此前，美国地方法院法官卡琳·伊默古特发布了临时限制令，暂停了该部署，理由是这可能侵犯了州的权利。
在上诉听证会上，由特朗普总统任命的法官瑞安·D·尼尔森和布里奇特·S·巴德似乎支持政府部署部队的权力。尼尔森法官质疑地方法院在多大程度上可以评估总统关于执法执行的决定。相反，由比尔·克林顿总统任命的苏珊·格雷伯法官对联邦政府在应对相对小规模且和平的抗议时使用紧急命令表示担忧。
特朗普政府辩称，部署是为了保护联邦人员和财产免受持续威胁。副助理司法部长埃里克·麦克阿瑟表示，总统有权决定此类行动的必要性。相比之下，俄勒冈州官员认为抗议活动不构成叛乱，地方执法部门有能力在无联邦干预的情况下维持秩序。俄勒冈州高级助理检察长斯泰西·查芬强调，这些抗议是受第一修正案保护的言论自由的体现。
上诉法院尚未作出裁决，但已表示将迅速做出决定。该判决预计将对联邦与州政府在美国境内部署军事力量的权力平衡产生重大影响。
事实核查
使用外部来源和数据库核实文章的事实。
✓
Confirmed
The U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals is currently reviewing the legality of President Donald Trump's decision to deploy National Guard troops to Portland, Oregon.
✓
Confirmed
U.S. District Judge Karin Immergut issued a temporary restraining order halting the deployment on the grounds that it may infringe upon the state's rights.
✓
Confirmed
During the appellate hearing, Judges Ryan D. Nelson and Bridget S. Bade, both appointed by President Trump, appeared to support the administration's authority to deploy troops.
✓
Confirmed
Judge Susan Graber, appointed by President Bill Clinton, expressed reservations about the federal government's use of emergency orders in response to relatively small and peaceful protests.
✓
Confirmed
The Trump administration argues that the deployment is necessary to protect federal personnel and property from ongoing threats.
✓
Confirmed
Oregon officials contend that the protests do not constitute a rebellion and that local law enforcement is capable of maintaining order without federal intervention.
✓
Confirmed
The appellate court has not yet issued a ruling but has indicated that a decision will be made promptly.
✓
Confirmed