Política

6 de octubre de 2025

Resumen

Illinois y Chicago han presentado una demanda contra la administración Trump, impugnando el despliegue federal de tropas de la Guardia Nacional en Chicago, citando violaciones constitucionales y falta de consentimiento estatal.

Illinois y la ciudad de Chicago han iniciado una acción legal contra la administración Trump, cuestionando el despliegue federal de tropas de la Guardia Nacional en Chicago. La demanda sostiene que la federalización de la Guardia Nacional sin el consentimiento estatal es inconstitucional y busca detener el despliegue.

El desafío legal sigue al anuncio de la Casa Blanca de que el presidente Donald Trump autorizó el envío de 300 miembros de la Guardia Nacional de Illinois a Chicago para "proteger a los oficiales y activos federales". Esta medida ha sido recibida con fuerte oposición por parte de los funcionarios estatales. El gobernador JB Pritzker criticó las acciones de la administración, declarando: "Quieren caos en el terreno. Quieren crear una zona de guerra para poder enviar aún más tropas".

El fiscal general Kwame Raoul enfatizó la falta de base legal para el despliegue, señalando que la Décima Enmienda "preserva la soberanía estatal para hacer cumplir las leyes estatales según lo consideren adecuado".

La demanda solicita al tribunal que declare ilegal la federalización de las tropas de la Guardia Nacional y que impida cualquier despliegue adicional en Illinois. Esta acción legal refleja un desafío similar en Oregón, donde un juez federal bloqueó temporalmente el despliegue de tropas de la Guardia Nacional en Portland, dictaminando que el presidente excedió su autoridad constitucional y violó la Décima Enmienda.

La administración Trump ha defendido su decisión, afirmando que el despliegue es necesario para proteger al personal y la propiedad federal en medio de las protestas en curso. Sin embargo, los funcionarios de Illinois argumentan que la intervención federal tiene motivaciones políticas y vulnera los derechos estatales.

A medida que se desarrollan los procedimientos legales, la situación subraya las tensiones continuas entre la autoridad federal y la soberanía estatal en la gestión del desorden civil y las responsabilidades de la aplicación de la ley.

Fuente

CNN

Primero reportado aquí

Oregón y Portland Demandaron a la Administración Trump por el Despliegue de la Guardia Nacional

29 de septiembre de 2025 • NBC News

Verificación de hechos

Verifique los hechos del artículo utilizando fuentes y bases de datos externas.

✓

Confirmed

Illinois and the city of Chicago have initiated legal action against the Trump administration, contesting the federal deployment of National Guard troops to Chicago.

✓

Confirmed

The lawsuit asserts that the federalization of the National Guard without state consent is unconstitutional and seeks to halt the deployment.

✓

Confirmed

The legal challenge follows the White House's announcement that President Donald Trump authorized 300 Illinois National Guard members to be sent to Chicago to 'protect federal officers and assets.'

✓

Confirmed

Governor JB Pritzker criticized the administration's actions, stating, 'They want mayhem on the ground. They want to create the war zone so that they can send in even more troops.'

✓

Confirmed

Attorney General Kwame Raoul emphasized the lack of legal basis for the deployment, noting that the 10th Amendment 'preserves state sovereignty to enforce state laws as they see fit.'

✓

Confirmed

The lawsuit requests the court to declare the federalization of National Guard troops unlawful and to prevent any further deployment to Illinois.

✓

Confirmed

This legal action mirrors a similar challenge in Oregon, where a federal judge temporarily blocked the deployment of National Guard troops to Portland, ruling that the President exceeded his constitutional authority and violated the Tenth Amendment.

✓

Confirmed

The Trump administration has defended its decision, stating that the deployment is necessary to protect federal personnel and property amidst ongoing protests.

Illinois y Chicago Demandaron a la Administración Trump por el Despliegue de la Guardia Nacional

Fuente

Primero reportado aquí

Oregón y Portland Demandaron a la Administración Trump por el Despliegue de la Guardia Nacional

Verificación de hechos

Illinois and the city of Chicago have initiated legal action against the Trump administration, contesting the federal deployment of National Guard troops to Chicago.

The lawsuit asserts that the federalization of the National Guard without state consent is unconstitutional and seeks to halt the deployment.

The legal challenge follows the White House's announcement that President Donald Trump authorized 300 Illinois National Guard members to be sent to Chicago to 'protect federal officers and assets.'

Governor JB Pritzker criticized the administration's actions, stating, 'They want mayhem on the ground. They want to create the war zone so that they can send in even more troops.'

Attorney General Kwame Raoul emphasized the lack of legal basis for the deployment, noting that the 10th Amendment 'preserves state sovereignty to enforce state laws as they see fit.'

The lawsuit requests the court to declare the federalization of National Guard troops unlawful and to prevent any further deployment to Illinois.

This legal action mirrors a similar challenge in Oregon, where a federal judge temporarily blocked the deployment of National Guard troops to Portland, ruling that the President exceeded his constitutional authority and violated the Tenth Amendment.

The Trump administration has defended its decision, stating that the deployment is necessary to protect federal personnel and property amidst ongoing protests.

Sigue leyendo, gratis

Sigue leyendo, gratis

Fuente

Primero reportado aquí

Oregón y Portland Demandaron a la Administración Trump por el Despliegue de la Guardia Nacional

Verificación de hechos

Illinois and the city of Chicago have initiated legal action against the Trump administration, contesting the federal deployment of National Guard troops to Chicago.

The lawsuit asserts that the federalization of the National Guard without state consent is unconstitutional and seeks to halt the deployment.

The legal challenge follows the White House's announcement that President Donald Trump authorized 300 Illinois National Guard members to be sent to Chicago to 'protect federal officers and assets.'

Governor JB Pritzker criticized the administration's actions, stating, 'They want mayhem on the ground. They want to create the war zone so that they can send in even more troops.'

Attorney General Kwame Raoul emphasized the lack of legal basis for the deployment, noting that the 10th Amendment 'preserves state sovereignty to enforce state laws as they see fit.'

The lawsuit requests the court to declare the federalization of National Guard troops unlawful and to prevent any further deployment to Illinois.

This legal action mirrors a similar challenge in Oregon, where a federal judge temporarily blocked the deployment of National Guard troops to Portland, ruling that the President exceeded his constitutional authority and violated the Tenth Amendment.

The Trump administration has defended its decision, stating that the deployment is necessary to protect federal personnel and property amidst ongoing protests.

Sigue leyendo, gratis

Sigue leyendo, gratis

Razones de manipulación

Emociones eliminadas

Tendencia política

Credibilidad