仅事实
最高法院大法官对特朗普关税合法性表示怀疑
摘要
在最近的一次听证会上，最高法院大法官质疑前总统特朗普关税的合法性，导致支持维持关税的预测市场赔率大幅下跌。
在周三的最高法院听证会上，大法官们对前总统唐纳德·特朗普根据《国际紧急经济权力法》（IEEPA）实施的关税的合法性表示怀疑。法院中的保守派和自由派成员均质疑政府宣称的征收这些关税的广泛权力，批评者认为这侵犯了国会的征税权。
针对大法官们的质询，副检察长D·约翰·索尔为政府立场辩护，声称这些关税对于国家安全和解决贸易失衡是必要的。然而，法院明显的疑虑已影响了预测市场。在Kalshi平台上，预测法院将维持特朗普关税的合约赔率从听证会前的近50%下降至听证会后的约30%。
下级联邦法院此前已裁定特朗普无权单方面实施这些关税。最高法院尚未宣布何时就此事作出裁决。
来源
CNBC首次报道于此
事实核查
使用外部来源和数据库核实文章的事实。
✓
Confirmed
During a Supreme Court hearing on Wednesday, justices expressed skepticism regarding the legality of former President Donald Trump's tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).
✓
Confirmed
Both conservative and liberal members of the Court questioned the broad authority claimed by the administration to levy these tariffs, which critics argue encroach upon Congress's power to tax.
✓
Confirmed
In response to the justices' inquiries, Solicitor General D. John Sauer defended the administration's position, asserting that the tariffs were necessary for national security and to address trade imbalances.
!
Unverified
However, the Court's apparent doubts have influenced prediction markets. On Kalshi, contracts predicting the Court would uphold Trump's tariffs declined from nearly 50% before the hearing to around 30% afterward.
✓
Confirmed
Lower federal courts have previously ruled that Trump lacked the legal authority to impose these tariffs unilaterally.
✓
Confirmed