第九巡回上诉法院将重新审理俄勒冈国民警卫队部署案
仅事实

第九巡回上诉法院将重新审理俄勒冈国民警卫队部署案

摘要

第九巡回上诉法院已撤销此前裁决,将重新审理有关联邦部署俄勒冈国民警卫队部队前往波特兰的案件。

第九巡回上诉法院已撤销此前允许联邦部署俄勒冈国民警卫队部队前往波特兰的决定。法院宣布将由更多法官组成的全体合议庭重新审理此案。

此举维持了当前局势,约有200名俄勒冈国民警卫队成员处于联邦控制之下,但因法律程序尚未结束,暂时无法部署。特朗普总统曾主张部署这些部队以保护波特兰的移民与海关执法局(ICE)设施,理由是持续的抗议活动以及联邦执法人员与示威者之间偶尔发生的冲突。

九月底,波特兰市及俄勒冈州对联邦政府提起诉讼,原因是国防部将200名俄勒冈士兵联邦化。美国地区法院法官卡琳·伊默古特本月早些时候发布了两项临时禁令:一项阻止俄勒冈士兵的部署,另一项则将禁令扩大至任何国民警卫队在波特兰的部署。

10月20日,第九巡回法院由三名法官组成的小组推翻了伊默古特法官的禁令,称尽管总统可能夸大了俄勒冈的情况,但他在审判中很可能证明现有联邦资源不足以在持续抗议的ICE设施执行联邦移民政策。

随后,第九巡回法院的一名法官请求对该决定进行全体合议庭复审。法院的公告显示,多数法官同意进行复审,实际上使三法官小组的裁决失效。全体合议庭听证的时间尚未确定。在此之前,俄勒冈国民警卫队成员虽已联邦化,但仍无法部署。更广泛诉讼的审判定于周三在美国地区法院开庭。

事实核查

使用外部来源和数据库核实文章的事实。

✓
Confirmed

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has vacated a previous decision that permitted the federal deployment of Oregon National Guard troops to Portland.

✓
Confirmed

The court announced it will rehear the case en banc, involving a larger panel of judges.

✓
Confirmed

This development maintains the current situation, where 200 Oregon National Guard members are under federal control but remain non-deployable as legal proceedings continue.

✓
Confirmed

President Trump has advocated for their deployment to protect the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facility in Portland, citing ongoing protests and occasional clashes between federal officers and demonstrators.

✓
Confirmed

In late September, Portland and the state of Oregon filed a lawsuit against the federal government following the Department of Defense's move to federalize 200 Oregon soldiers.

✓
Confirmed

U.S. District Court Judge Karin Immergut issued two temporary restraining orders earlier this month: one blocking the deployment of Oregon soldiers and another extending the prohibition to any National Guard deployment in Portland.

✓
Confirmed

On October 20, a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit overturned Judge Immergut's restraining orders, stating that while the president may have exaggerated the situation in Oregon, he would likely prove at trial that existing federal resources were insufficient to enforce federal immigration policy at the ICE facility under continuous protest.

✓
Confirmed

Subsequently, a judge on the Ninth Circuit requested an en banc review of the decision. The court's announcement indicates that a majority of judges agreed to this review, effectively nullifying the three-judge panel's ruling.

继续阅读——免费

创建免费账户以关注新闻。无需银行卡。