联邦上诉法院质疑对部署国民警卫队至波特兰的禁令
仅事实

联邦上诉法院质疑对部署国民警卫队至波特兰的禁令

摘要

第九巡回上诉法院正在审查一项临时禁令,该禁令阻止特朗普总统将俄勒冈州国民警卫队部署到波特兰,以应对持续的抗议活动。

联邦上诉法院正在审查一项临时禁令,该禁令阻止唐纳德·特朗普总统将俄勒冈州国民警卫队部署到波特兰。第九巡回上诉法院听取了特朗普政府的辩论,政府主张总统有权在州长蒂娜·科特克反对的情况下联邦化国民警卫队。政府寻求推翻美国地方法院法官卡琳·伊默古特签发的禁令,伊默古特法官认为缺乏入侵或叛乱等条件的充分证据,无法证明部署的合理性。由法官瑞安·纳尔逊、布里奇特·巴德和苏珊·格雷伯组成的上诉法院合议庭质疑司法机关在限制总统此类权力中的角色。纳尔逊法官询问法院是否有能力评估总统执行法律的行为。政府辩称,鉴于持续的抗议活动,部署国民警卫队对于保护联邦财产是必要的。俄勒冈州和波特兰市则认为抗议活动大多是和平的,军事干预是行政权力的过度扩张。助理司法部长斯泰西·玛丽·查芬表示,总统的判断与现实脱节。上诉法院尚未对此事作出裁决。

事实核查

使用外部来源和数据库核实文章的事实。

✓
Confirmed

A federal appeals court is reviewing a temporary restraining order that prevents President Donald Trump from deploying the Oregon National Guard to Portland.

✓
Confirmed

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals heard arguments from the Trump administration, which asserts the president's authority to federalize the Guard over Governor Tina Kotek's objections.

✓
Confirmed

The administration seeks to overturn the order issued by U.S. District Judge Karin Immergut, who found insufficient evidence of conditions such as invasion or rebellion to justify the deployment.

✓
Confirmed

The appeals court panel, comprising Judges Ryan Nelson, Bridget Bade, and Susan Graber, questioned the judiciary's role in limiting presidential authority in such matters.

✓
Confirmed

The administration argues that the deployment is necessary to protect federal property amid ongoing protests.

✓
Confirmed

The state of Oregon and the city of Portland contend that the protests are largely peaceful and that military intervention is an overreach of executive power.

✓
Confirmed

Assistant Attorney General Stacy Marie Chaffin stated that the president's determinations are untethered from reality.

✓
Confirmed

The appeals court has not yet issued a ruling on the matter.

继续阅读——免费

创建免费账户以关注新闻。无需银行卡。