特朗普政府寻求最高法院批准在伊利诺伊州部署国民警卫队
仅事实

特朗普政府寻求最高法院批准在伊利诺伊州部署国民警卫队

摘要

特朗普政府已向最高法院提交请愿,要求推翻阻止在伊利诺伊州部署国民警卫队部队的下级法院裁决。

特朗普政府已向美国最高法院提交紧急上诉,寻求推翻阻止在伊利诺伊州部署国民警卫队部队的下级法院判决。此举是在政府试图向芝加哥地区派遣部队过程中遭遇一系列法律挫折之后采取的。

10月9日,美国地方法官艾普丽尔·佩里发布临时禁令,阻止联邦化及在伊利诺伊州内部署国民警卫队部队。政府随后向第七巡回上诉法院提出上诉,该法院维持了部署禁令,但允许部队保持联邦化状态。上诉法院认为,现有证据不足以证明总统根据联邦法律采取行动的合理性,指出“政治反对并非叛乱”,且示威活动并未妨碍联邦官员执行移民法的能力。

在向最高法院的上诉中,政府辩称下级法院的命令“削弱了总统部署国民警卫队的命令”。司法部长约翰·绍尔认为,部署是保护芝加哥地区联邦人员和财产的必要措施。

伊利诺伊州州长JB·普ritzker强烈反对联邦化及在该州部署国民警卫队,强调州主权的重要性,并表达了对社区军事化的担忧。

最高法院对此事的裁决将对联邦与州权力的平衡以及总统在国内部署军事力量的能力产生重大影响。

来源

NPR

事实核查

使用外部来源和数据库核实文章的事实。

✓
Confirmed

The Trump administration has filed an emergency appeal with the U.S. Supreme Court, seeking to overturn lower court decisions that have blocked the deployment of National Guard troops in Illinois.

✓
Confirmed

On October 9, U.S. District Judge April Perry issued a temporary restraining order preventing the federalization and deployment of National Guard troops within Illinois.

✓
Confirmed

The administration appealed this decision to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, which upheld the block on deployment while allowing the troops to remain federalized.

✓
Confirmed

The appellate court found insufficient evidence to justify the president's actions under federal law, stating that 'political opposition is not rebellion' and that the demonstrations did not impede federal officers' ability to enforce immigration laws.

✓
Confirmed

In its appeal to the Supreme Court, the administration argues that the lower court's order 'eviscerates the president's order' deploying the Guard.

✓
Confirmed

Solicitor General John Sauer contends that the deployment is necessary to protect federal personnel and property in the Chicago area.

✓
Confirmed

Illinois Governor JB Pritzker has strongly opposed the federalization and deployment of the National Guard in the state, emphasizing the importance of state sovereignty and expressing concerns about the militarization of communities.

✓
Confirmed

The Supreme Court's decision on this matter will have significant implications for the balance of power between federal and state authorities and the president's ability to deploy military forces domestically.

继续阅读——免费

创建免费账户以关注新闻。无需银行卡。