联邦上诉法院暂时解除对俄勒冈国民警卫队部署至波特兰的禁令
仅事实

联邦上诉法院暂时解除对俄勒冈国民警卫队部署至波特兰的禁令

摘要

第九巡回上诉法院暂时解除了一项下级法院阻止俄勒冈国民警卫队部队部署至波特兰的命令,但对任何州国民警卫队部署至该市的更广泛禁令仍然有效。

第九巡回上诉法院暂时解除了一项下级法院阻止俄勒冈国民警卫队部队部署至波特兰的命令。然而,阻止任何州国民警卫队部署至该市的更广泛禁令仍然有效。

该行政暂缓令专门针对美国地方法官卡琳·伊默古特于10月4日发布的命令,该命令禁止俄勒冈国民警卫队进入波特兰地区。第九巡回法院发布暂缓令的决定旨在在法院审议期间维持现状,而不对双方法律论点的实质进行评估。

伊默古特法官于10月5日随后发布的命令,禁止任何州的国民警卫队部队部署至波特兰,仍然有效。特朗普政府尚未正式对这一更广泛的命令提出上诉或挑战。

第九巡回法院表示:“在当前情况下,授予行政暂缓令将最好地维持现状。在10月4日临时限制令发布之前,俄勒冈国民警卫队成员已被联邦化,但尚未部署。”

关于待上诉期间暂缓令的口头辩论定于周四进行。

在10月5日一次罕见的深夜听证会上,伊默古特法官对特朗普政府试图规避她之前命令表示担忧。她指出,波特兰的情况“并未出现显著的暴力或破坏”,不足以证明联邦接管国民警卫队的必要性,并形容总统关于该市的说法“完全脱离事实”。

事实核查

使用外部来源和数据库核实文章的事实。

!
Unverified

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has temporarily lifted a lower court's order that blocked the deployment of Oregon National Guard troops to Portland.

✓
Confirmed

Judge Immergut's subsequent order from October 5, which prohibits the deployment of National Guard troops from any state into Portland, continues to stand.

!
Unverified

The Trump administration has not formally appealed or challenged this broader order.

!
Unverified

The Ninth Circuit stated, 'In the circumstances here, granting an administrative stay will best preserve the status quo. Prior to the October 4 temporary restraining order, Oregon National Guard members had been federalized but not deployed.'

!
Unverified

Oral arguments for a stay pending appeal are scheduled for Thursday.

✓
Confirmed

During an unusual late-night hearing on October 5, Judge Immergut expressed concern over the Trump administration's attempt to circumvent her earlier order.

✓
Confirmed

She noted that conditions in Portland were 'not significantly violent or disruptive' to justify a federal takeover of the National Guard and described the president's claims about the city as 'simply untethered to the facts.'

继续阅读——免费

创建免费账户以关注新闻。无需银行卡。