Prosecutors Advise Against Charging Former FBI Director James Comey
Just the facts

Prosecutors Advise Against Charging Former FBI Director James Comey

Summary

Federal prosecutors in Virginia have recommended against charging former FBI Director James Comey with perjury, citing insufficient evidence.

Federal prosecutors in Virginia have concluded a two-month investigation into former FBI Director James Comey, determining there is insufficient evidence to support perjury charges related to his 2020 congressional testimony. In a detailed memo, prosecutors advised U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan that probable cause does not exist to secure an indictment or conviction.

Despite this recommendation, Halligan plans to present the case to a grand jury, following President Donald Trump's directive to prosecute political adversaries. Trump recently stated, "I just want people to act, they have to act, and we want to act fast," after instructing Attorney General Pam Bondi to pursue charges against Comey and others.

Halligan, a former insurance lawyer with no prosecutorial experience, has been cautioned by career prosecutors that seeking charges would violate Department of Justice policy and raise ethical concerns. Nevertheless, she intends to proceed, aligning with the mandate received upon her recent appointment.

The push for an indictment comes as the five-year statute of limitations for the alleged offense nears expiration. This development follows the resignation of former U.S. Attorney Erik Siebert, who faced pressure to bring charges against other political figures. Trump's previous legal challenges have been cited to justify these actions, with the president expressing frustration over perceived inaction against his adversaries.

The investigation into Comey began in early August, focusing on his 2020 testimony regarding Russian interference in the 2016 election. Prosecutors examined whether his statements could support perjury or obstruction charges but found insufficient evidence to proceed.

"I would say in the main it was done by the book, it was appropriate, and it was essential that it be done," Comey testified in 2016 regarding the investigation.

Ultimately, prosecutors concluded that the charges would likely fail to secure a conviction and did not meet the probable cause standard for an indictment.

Fact-checking

Fact-check the facts of the article using external sources and databases.

✕
Not Confirmed

Federal prosecutors in Virginia have concluded a two-month investigation into former FBI Director James Comey, determining there is insufficient evidence to support perjury charges related to his 2020 congressional testimony.

!
Unverified

In a detailed memo, prosecutors advised U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan that probable cause does not exist to secure an indictment or conviction.

!
Unverified

Despite this recommendation, Halligan plans to present the case to a grand jury, following President Donald Trump's directive to prosecute political adversaries.

!
Unverified

Trump recently stated, 'I just want people to act, they have to act, and we want to act fast,' after instructing Attorney General Pam Bondi to pursue charges against Comey and others.

!
Unverified

Halligan, a former insurance lawyer with no prosecutorial experience, has been cautioned by career prosecutors that seeking charges would violate Department of Justice policy and raise ethical concerns.

✓
Confirmed

The push for an indictment comes as the five-year statute of limitations for the alleged offense nears expiration.

!
Partly Confirmed

This development follows the resignation of former U.S. Attorney Erik Siebert, who faced pressure to bring charges against other political figures.

✓
Confirmed

The investigation into Comey began in early August, focusing on his 2020 testimony regarding Russian interference in the 2016 election.

Keep reading — for free

Create a free account to follow the news. No card required.