Washington Post editorial says Trump’s Iran strike, not Big Oil, drives higher fuel prices
Just the facts

Washington Post editorial says Trump’s Iran strike, not Big Oil, drives higher fuel prices

Select a version of the text written from a presumed ideological perspective. This is not the original text, but a hypothetical version — how someone with that viewpoint might have phrased it. Tapping the current version again will return to the original or select cleaned version.

Summary

The Washington Post editorial board argued that President Trump’s military action against Iran, not oil companies, is the primary cause of recent gasoline price increases.

The Washington Post editorial board said rising gasoline prices are driven by supply-and-demand factors linked to President Donald Trump’s military operation against Iran, rather than alleged windfall profits by major oil firms. The board noted that the conflict has largely shut down the Strait of Hormuz, which handles about 20 percent of global oil trade, and that this disruption is a key factor behind higher global prices.

The editorial cited recent earnings reports from Chevron ($12.1 billion) and ExxonMobil ($14.5 billion) and said the president’s criticism of “too much money” earned by the companies overlooks the impact of the Iran operation and related tariffs. It added that price increases at the pump are the result of decisions made in Washington, not the actions of oil majors.

"A vital lesson from the war in Iran is that America needs an abundant supply of every form of energy the market can produce," the board wrote, suggesting that expanding domestic oil production would be a more effective way to lower prices.

Economic adviser Dr. Robert Shapiro told AlterNet that the war has added a risk premium to oil markets, raising insurance costs and creating uncertainty that dampens investment, and that prices are unlikely to return to pre-Trump levels even if hostilities cease.

White House spokeswoman Taylor Rogers responded that U.S. energy dominance reduces reliance on the Strait of Hormuz and that the administration’s “energy dominance agenda” is attracting international partners seeking greater energy security.

Source

AlterNet

Keep reading — for free

Create a free account to follow the news. No card required.