Appeals Court Temporarily Allows White House Ballroom Construction to Proceed
Select a version of the text written from a presumed ideological perspective. This is not the original text, but a hypothetical version — how someone with that viewpoint might have phrased it. Tapping the current version again will return to the original or select cleaned version.
A federal appeals court has permitted the continuation of President Donald Trump's White House ballroom construction until April 17, pending further legal review.
A federal appeals court has temporarily permitted the continuation of President Donald Trump's White House ballroom construction until April 17, pending further legal review. This decision follows a lower court's order to halt the project due to the administration's lack of congressional approval.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued the stay on Saturday, allowing work on the $400 million, 90,000-square-foot ballroom to proceed. The panel directed U.S. District Judge Richard Leon to reconsider the national security implications of stopping the construction, as the administration argues that the project includes critical security features. The appeals court's order extends the deadline to halt construction, providing the administration time to seek Supreme Court review.
Previously, Judge Leon had ruled that the project could not move forward without congressional approval, emphasizing that the president is a steward, not the owner, of the White House. The National Trust for Historic Preservation, which filed the lawsuit to stop the construction, welcomed Leon's ruling, expressing concerns over the project's impact on the historic integrity of the White House.
President Trump has defended the project, stating that the ballroom is essential for national security and future presidential safety. He has also indicated that the construction is funded by private donations, with public funds covering only the security components.
The legal battle over the White House ballroom highlights the ongoing tensions between historic preservation efforts and the administration's plans to modify the executive mansion. Further court proceedings are expected as both sides continue to present their arguments.