上诉法院允许联邦部署俄勒冈国民警卫队至波特兰
仅事实

上诉法院允许联邦部署俄勒冈国民警卫队至波特兰

摘要

第九巡回上诉法院推翻了一项临时禁令,允许联邦政府在持续抗议期间部署俄勒冈国民警卫队部队前往波特兰。

第九巡回上诉法院推翻了一项临时禁令,允许联邦政府部署俄勒冈国民警卫队部队前往波特兰。此决定是针对该市美国移民与海关执法局设施附近持续抗议活动作出的回应。

该上诉小组以2比1的裁决认为,总统很可能依据《美国法典》第10编第12406条行使了合法权力,将国民警卫队联邦化。由特朗普总统任命的法官瑞安·尼尔森和布里奇特·巴德指出,尽管部分抗议活动和平进行,但许多抗议已转为暴力,威胁联邦执法人员及财产安全。法官苏珊·格雷伯持异议,表达了对该裁决侵蚀核心宪法原则的担忧,包括各州对其民兵的控制权以及个人的第一修正案权利。

俄勒冈州总检察长丹·雷菲尔德批评该裁决,称其赋予总统以最小理由单方面部署州士兵的权力。他敦促第九巡回法院全体法官在任何部署发生前撤销该决定。州长蒂娜·科特克和波特兰市长基思·威尔逊也谴责了法院的决定,强调需要透明度和社区主导的解决方案,而非军事干预。

这场法律争斗始于九月底,当时特朗普总统下令派遣200名俄勒冈国民警卫队成员保护联邦财产,以应对抗议活动。一名联邦法官最初发布了临时禁令,阻止部署,理由是缺乏足够的暴力或扰乱事件来证明联邦干预的必要性。第九巡回法院最近的裁决推翻了该禁令,尽管对来自其他州的国民警卫队部队部署至波特兰的更广泛禁令仍然有效。

事实核查

使用外部来源和数据库核实文章的事实。

✓
Confirmed

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has overturned a temporary restraining order, allowing the federal government to deploy Oregon National Guard troops to Portland.

✓
Confirmed

The appellate panel, in a 2-1 decision, found that the President likely exercised lawful authority in federalizing the National Guard under 10 U.S.C. §12406.

✓
Confirmed

Judges Ryan Nelson and Bridget Bade, both appointed by President Trump, noted that while some protests have been peaceful, many have turned violent, posing threats to federal law enforcement officers and property.

✓
Confirmed

Judge Susan Graber dissented, expressing concern that the ruling erodes core constitutional principles, including states' control over their militias and individuals' First Amendment rights.

✓
Confirmed

Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield criticized the ruling, stating that it grants the President unilateral power to deploy state soldiers with minimal justification.

✓
Confirmed

Governor Tina Kotek and Portland Mayor Keith Wilson also condemned the court's decision, emphasizing the need for transparency and community-led solutions over military intervention.

✓
Confirmed

The legal battle began in late September when President Trump ordered 200 Oregon National Guard members to protect federal property amid protests.

✓
Confirmed

A federal judge initially issued a temporary restraining order blocking the deployment, citing a lack of significant violence or disruption to justify federal intervention.

继续阅读——免费

创建免费账户以关注新闻。无需银行卡。