联邦法官暂时阻止国民警卫队部署至波特兰
仅事实

联邦法官暂时阻止国民警卫队部署至波特兰

摘要

联邦法官发布临时禁令,阻止200名国民警卫队部队部署至俄勒冈州波特兰,此前州和市官员提起诉讼,质疑国民警卫队的联邦化。

联邦法官发布临时禁令,阻止200名国民警卫队部队部署至俄勒冈州波特兰,此前州和市官员提起诉讼,质疑国民警卫队的联邦化。

美国地方法官卡琳·J·伊默古特批准了该禁令,此前俄勒冈州和波特兰市对特朗普政府提起诉讼,认为此次部署违反了美国宪法及限制军事参与国内执法的联邦法律。该禁令将于10月18日到期,但可能会延长。

特朗普政府曾宣布计划联邦化并部署俄勒冈国民警卫队,以保护联邦财产,因波特兰持续发生抗议活动。州和市官员认为,当前情况不符合联邦化的法律标准,该标准包括入侵或叛乱等情形。

庭审过程中,伊默古特法官对政府方面部署理由表示怀疑,特别质疑依赖社交媒体帖子作为联邦干预必要性的证据。

司法部表示计划对该裁决提出上诉,坚称总统在应对针对联邦财产和人员的威胁时,行使了部署国民警卫队的权限。

此次法律挑战类似于加利福尼亚的一起案件,当地一名联邦法官裁定特朗普政府在洛杉矶部署国民警卫队和海军陆战队违法,理由是违反了限制军事参与国内执法的《民兵法》(Posse Comitatus Act)。

随着联邦和地方当局在军事参与民间执法活动的法律及宪法影响方面展开博弈,波特兰的局势仍在不断发展。

事实核查

使用外部来源和数据库核实文章的事实。

✓
Confirmed

A federal judge has issued a temporary restraining order halting the deployment of 200 National Guard troops to Portland, Oregon, following a lawsuit by state and city officials challenging the federalization of the Guard.

✓
Confirmed

U.S. District Judge Karin J. Immergut granted the order after Oregon and Portland filed suit against the Trump administration, arguing that the deployment violated the U.S. Constitution and federal laws that limit military involvement in domestic law enforcement.

✓
Confirmed

The order is set to expire on October 18 but may be extended.

✓
Confirmed

The Trump administration had announced plans to federalize and deploy the Oregon National Guard to protect federal property amid ongoing protests in Portland.

✓
Confirmed

State and city officials contended that the situation did not meet the legal criteria for such federalization, which includes scenarios like invasion or rebellion.

✓
Confirmed

During the court proceedings, Judge Immergut expressed skepticism regarding the administration's justification for the deployment, particularly questioning the reliance on social media posts as evidence of the necessity for federal intervention.

✓
Confirmed

The Department of Justice has indicated plans to appeal the ruling, maintaining that the President acted within his authority to deploy the National Guard in response to threats against federal property and personnel.

✓
Confirmed

This legal challenge follows a similar case in California, where a federal judge ruled that the Trump administration's deployment of the National Guard and Marines in Los Angeles was unlawful, citing violations of the Posse Comitatus Act, which restricts military involvement in domestic law enforcement.

✓
Confirmed

The situation in Portland continues to evolve as federal and local authorities navigate the legal and constitutional implications of military involvement in civilian law enforcement activities.

继续阅读——免费

创建免费账户以关注新闻。无需银行卡。