Judge Dismisses Trump's $15 Billion Defamation Lawsuit Against The New York Times
Just the facts

Judge Dismisses Trump's $15 Billion Defamation Lawsuit Against The New York Times

Summary

A federal judge in Florida has dismissed President Donald Trump's $15 billion defamation lawsuit against The New York Times, citing the complaint's excessive length and improper content.

A federal judge in Florida has dismissed President Donald Trump's $15 billion defamation lawsuit against The New York Times, citing the complaint's excessive length and improper content. U.S. District Judge Steven Merryday criticized the 85-page filing as "decidedly improper and impermissible," noting that it violated federal civil procedure rules requiring a concise statement of the claim.

"A complaint is not a public forum for vituperation and invective—not a protected platform to rage against an adversary," Merryday wrote in his ruling.

The lawsuit, filed on September 15, 2025, accused The New York Times, several of its journalists, and publisher Penguin Random House of defamation through multiple articles and the book "Lucky Loser," alleging they spread false statements about Trump's business acumen and engaged in election interference.

Merryday granted Trump 28 days to submit an amended complaint, limiting the length to 40 pages. The New York Times welcomed the ruling, stating that the lawsuit lacked merit and was an attempt to stifle independent reporting.

Source

AP News

Fact-checking

Fact-check the facts of the article using external sources and databases.

✓
Confirmed

A federal judge in Florida has dismissed President Donald Trump's $15 billion defamation lawsuit against The New York Times.

✓
Confirmed

U.S. District Judge Steven Merryday criticized the 85-page filing as 'decidedly improper and impermissible.'

✓
Confirmed

The lawsuit was filed on September 15, 2025.

✓
Confirmed

Merryday granted Trump 28 days to submit an amended complaint, limiting the length to 40 pages.

!
Partly Confirmed

The lawsuit accused The New York Times, several journalists, and publisher Penguin Random House of defamation through multiple articles and the book 'Lucky Loser.'

✓
Confirmed

The New York Times welcomed the ruling, stating that the lawsuit lacked merit.

!
Unverified

Merryday noted that the complaint violated federal civil procedure rules requiring a concise statement of the claim.

✕
Not Confirmed

The lawsuit alleges engagement in election interference by The New York Times.

Keep reading — for free

Create a free account to follow the news. No card required.