Nikole Hannah-Jones Reflects on Ten-Year Outcome of Enrolling Daughter in Underperforming School
Nikole Hannah-Jones reports that her decision to send her four-year-old daughter to a low-performing public school in Brooklyn did not improve the school and negatively affected her child, according to her recent essay.
Nikole Hannah-Jones, the journalist known for the 1619 Project, revisited a decision she made a decade ago to enroll her daughter Najya in a struggling Brooklyn public school rather than a higher-performing or private option. In a recent essay, she said the experiment did not produce the intended benefits for the school or her child. Hannah-Jones described observing students without lunch or adult supervision during a lunchtime visit, noting chaotic behavior that she said would trigger immediate action in a private setting. She added that attempts to engage the school's principal were largely unsuccessful, with the administrator often absent or unresponsive.
Hannah-Jones originally argued that upper-middle-class parents could help improve underperforming schools by leveraging resources and advocacy. She said her presence did not lift the school’s performance and that her daughter experienced a decline in her educational environment. The account contrasts with earlier praise from some progressive observers who viewed the decision as a constructive act.
"When Najya was in third grade, I found kids sitting there with no lunch and no adult supervision, while teachers' aides and cafeteria workers appeared disengaged," Hannah-Jones wrote.
The essay has sparked renewed debate about the role of parental involvement and socioeconomic factors in public-school reform.