Chargers' Offensive Struggles Prompt Debate Over Coordinator Mike McDaniel's Fit with Justin Herbert
Analyst argues that despite Mike McDaniel's coaching reputation, his offensive system may not suit quarterback Justin Herbert, contributing to the team's 0-6 start.
The Los Angeles Chargers entered their bye week with an 0–6 record, sparking discussion about offensive coordinator Mike McDaniel's suitability for quarterback Justin Herbert. While McDaniel is recognized as a talented play-caller, recent game footage has highlighted mismatches between his scheme and Herbert's style, including timing issues on play calls, inconsistent screen passes, and backfield motion that appeared disjointed.
Observers note that Herbert has previously thrived under coordinators who emphasize pre-snap reads, such as Joe Lombardi, whereas McDaniel's approach aligns more with Shanahan-style, post-snap-leaning offenses. The analyst compares this dynamic to past quarterback-coach conflicts, citing examples like Tom Brady's friction with Bruce Arians.
Defensively, the Chargers have performed strongly, ranking second in EPA per play allowed over the past three weeks. However, the offense's inefficiency has raised concerns about the team's overall competitiveness, with some suggesting a record closer to 2–4 given the defensive performance.
The article also mentions that assistant coach Adam Gase, who has prior play-calling experience, could be considered as an alternative, though his past results with quarterbacks such as Sam Darnold are mixed. The analyst concludes that a better alignment between offensive philosophy and Herbert's preferences may be necessary, even if it means replacing McDaniel.
"McDaniel's fatal flaw was assuming that this style of offense was universal and absolute, when in reality, the best thing for Herbert may be getting the McDaniel ideology out of this offense altogether," the analyst wrote.