Texas judge denies new trial request for Karmelo Anthony in Austin Metcalf murder case
Just the facts

Texas judge denies new trial request for Karmelo Anthony in Austin Metcalf murder case

Summary

Collin County Judge Michael Chitty rejected Karmelo Anthony's motion for a new trial in the 2025 killing of 17-year-old Austin Metcalf, prompting both prosecutors and the defense to outline their next steps.

Collin County Judge Michael Chitty on Saturday denied Karmelo Anthony's request for a new trial in the murder of 17-year-old Austin Metcalf, a case that concluded with a 35-year prison sentence after a jury rejected Anthony's self-defense claim. The decision followed a two-day hearing that included testimony from both the prosecution and Anthony's new defense team.

District Attorney Greg Willis said the court's ruling was expected and affirmed confidence in the verdict, adding that the Metcalf family’s “thoughts and prayers” remain with them. Anthony’s lead attorney, Russell Wilson, expressed disagreement with the ruling and indicated the appeal will continue in the Fifth Court of Appeals, emphasizing the team's commitment to pursue all legal remedies.

During the hearing, prosecutors and defense lawyers disclosed additional background information about both the defendant and the victim. Prosecutor Bill Wirskye, who also led the original murder trial, argued that a pre-trial “gentleman’s agreement” limited discussion of the parties’ histories to protect the trial from threats and public pressure. The defense contended that the agreement compromised Anthony’s right to a fair trial and violated federal law.

Court documents revealed prior incidents involving Metcalf and his twin brother, including graffiti, alleged use of racial slurs, bullying and assault allegations. Similar records for Anthony detailed threatening texts, stalking and assault allegations from his teenage years in Louisiana. Both sides argued that these histories should have been considered, but the trial was conducted without them.

The judge’s denial leaves the conviction intact, while the defense prepares to seek appellate review, and prosecutors maintain that the verdict reflects a proper application of the law.

Source

CBS News

Keep reading — for free

Create a free account to follow the news. No card required.