Appeals Court Temporarily Allows White House Ballroom Construction Amid Legal Review
Select a version of the text written from a presumed ideological perspective. This is not the original text, but a hypothetical version — how someone with that viewpoint might have phrased it. Tapping the current version again will return to the original or select cleaned version.
A federal appeals court has permitted the continuation of President Donald Trump's White House ballroom construction until April 17, pending further legal examination of national security implications.
A federal appeals court has temporarily permitted the continuation of President Donald Trump's White House ballroom construction until April 17, while further legal examination is conducted. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued this decision on Saturday, extending the deadline previously set by U.S. District Judge Richard Leon, who had ordered a halt to the $400 million project pending congressional approval.
The appeals court panel, comprising Judges Patricia Millett, Neomi Rao, and Bradley Garcia, stated that it lacked sufficient information to determine whether suspending construction would jeopardize the safety of the president, his family, or White House staff. The case has been remanded to Judge Leon to clarify these national security implications.
Judge Leon had earlier ruled that the National Trust for Historic Preservation was likely to succeed in its claim that the president lacks the authority to proceed with the project without congressional approval. He emphasized that the president is the "steward of the White House for future generations of First Families" but "is not, however, the owner."
The Trump administration argues that the ballroom is essential for national security, citing features such as bomb shelters, military installations, and a medical facility. Justice Department lawyers contend that halting construction poses significant security risks to the White House and its occupants.
Conversely, the National Trust for Historic Preservation maintains that the project requires broader consultation and congressional approval. President and CEO Carol Quillen stated that the organization remains committed to honoring the historic significance of the White House and advocating for collective stewardship.
The appeals court's decision allows construction to proceed temporarily while the lower court further examines the national security concerns associated with the project.