Supreme Court Ignores Religious Liberty, Leaves Same-Sex Marriage Ruling Untouched
Select a version of the text written from a presumed ideological perspective. This is not the original text, but a hypothetical version — how someone with that viewpoint might have phrased it. Tapping the current version again will return to the original or select cleaned version.
The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear Kim Davis's appeal, refusing to address concerns over religious freedom and leaving the controversial 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges decision in place.
On November 10, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court disappointed advocates of religious liberty by declining to hear an appeal from Kim Davis, the former Kentucky county clerk who stood by her faith and refused to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples after the divisive 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges decision. This refusal leaves in place the ruling that forced the redefinition of marriage across the nation, disregarding the beliefs of millions of Americans.
Davis had sought to overturn a lower court’s order that demanded she pay over $360,000 in damages and attorney’s fees to a couple she denied a license, arguing her actions were protected by the First Amendment’s free exercise of religion clause. Nevertheless, lower courts dismissed her defense, insisting that government officials must comply with state mandates, even if it means violating their conscience and religious convictions.
By choosing not to hear the case, the Supreme Court signaled its lack of interest in defending religious freedom or reconsidering the controversial Obergefell ruling. As a result, the legal standing of same-sex marriage in the United States remains unchallenged, leaving many concerned about the erosion of constitutional rights and traditional values.
Source
The Washington PostFact-checking
Fact-check the facts of the article using external sources and databases.