Jury Begins Deliberations in Massachusetts Trial of Lindsay Clancy
A Massachusetts jury will decide whether mother Lindsay Clancy is guilty of first-degree murder, second-degree murder or involuntary manslaughter for the deaths of her three children, with the defense citing postpartum psychosis.
A Massachusetts jury is now tasked with determining the criminal liability of Lindsay Clancy, who faces charges ranging from first-degree murder to involuntary manslaughter for the deaths of her three children, ages eight months to five years. Over a five-week trial, the defense argued that Clancy suffered from postpartum psychosis at the time of the killings, while prosecutors maintained she understood the difference between right and wrong.
Clancy has not denied killing her two sons and daughter, who were restrained with exercise bands before she attempted suicide by jumping from a window, an effort that left her paralyzed and attending the trial in a wheelchair. Her attorney, Kevin Reddington, reiterated that she was ill with a “disease and defect” and expressed confidence that prosecutors could not disprove the psychosis claim.
Prosecutor Jennifer Sprague acknowledged Clancy’s mental illness but contended that she was capable of distinguishing right from wrong when she strangled the children. She also noted that, despite an “abundance of care,” Clancy had concealed harmful thoughts from medical professionals.
If the jury returns a verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity, Clancy would be committed to a psychiatric facility rather than released. A conviction of any degree would result in imprisonment.