Giants vs. Vikings preseason All-22 review highlights defensive performances and quarterback play

A detailed All-22 review of the New York Giants’ preseason game against the Minnesota Vikings offers a second-look at player performances beyond the initial impressions. The author, who does not claim scouting expertise, separates observations into first- and second-half segments.

In the first half, linebacker Micah McFadden was noted for missing several plays he appeared positioned to make, including an 18-yard run on the opening snap. Nose tackle Josh Tupou, initially criticized, earned an 89.5 Pro Football Focus grade after the review, showing stoutness at the point of attack except for one sideways turn. Defensive back Nic Jones was penalized for a ten-yard loss while attempting to block a kickoff return. Quarterback Jaxson Dart’s unusual bubble screen was attributed to a poor shotgun snap from Bryan Hudson, and a missed opportunity to deliver the ball to Isaiah Likely resulted in a sack rather than a potential first down. Sisi Mauigoa’s impact was described as “barely noticeable,” which the reviewer considered positive. Coach John Harbaugh commented that Cam Skattebo’s performance was approaching the level seen on film last year, noting his aggressive running style. The analysis also mentioned the usage of four-man fronts with defensive end Chauncey Golston and a sack by Darius Alexander that followed a defensive tackle dropping into coverage.

During the second half, quarterback Brandon Allen’s play was described as poor, with missed reads leading to interceptions and a decision not to throw on a second opportunity. The review cites the Giants’ signing of veteran quarterback Jake Haener as a response to such issues. Defensive tackle Leki Fotu made consecutive impactful plays, stopping a middle run and deflecting a screen pass. The sack of Allen in the third quarter highlighted deficiencies in the offensive line, with left guard Daniel Faalele and left tackle J.C. Davis being beaten, while Evan Neal performed adequately.

The reviewer concludes that, although the fourth quarter was not fully observed, the analysis provides a clearer picture of individual performances and areas for improvement.