Trump's claim of Chinese voter-file theft contradicted by declassified intelligence

Resumen

U.S. intelligence assessments released by the White House show China gathered public voter registration data for analysis, not to alter the 2020 election, challenging President Trump's statements about a massive compromise.

President Donald Trump told a nationwide audience on July 16 that China had carried out the "largest compromise of election data in history" by illicitly acquiring 220 million U.S. voter files and that Beijing had fought to prevent his re-election. He claimed the data included names, addresses, phone numbers and party affiliation, and said U.S. agencies kept the threat hidden.

A review of declassified intelligence documents released by the White House indicates the claims are inaccurate. The National Intelligence Council assessed that Beijing sought the information mainly to predict electoral outcomes and to shape U.S. policy toward China, a practice it has used since at least 2008. The assessment found no evidence that China interfered with election infrastructure, vote tabulation, or result transmission.

The intelligence report also noted that much of the voter data was obtained from publicly available commercial websites and data brokers, and that a Chinese actor downloaded records from several states in January 2022—well after the 2020 election. Former Homeland Security chief of staff Miles Taylor said the data consisted of basic registration details that cannot be used to alter ballots or vote counts.

Election officials from multiple states confirmed that voter files are public records and that there is no indication of tampering. Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes said he had "zero evidence" of any compromise in his state. David Becker, former Justice Department voting-rights official, likened the situation to having a class list that cannot change grades.

Chinese government spokesperson Liu Chang reiterated that China does not interfere in U.S. elections, describing the vote as an internal matter decided by American voters.

The discrepancy between Trump’s statements and the intelligence assessments highlights a longstanding pattern of the administration receiving briefings on foreign influence operations, which former officials say were not reflected in the president’s public remarks.

Sigue leyendo, gratis

Crea una cuenta gratis para seguir las noticias. No se requiere tarjeta.