Virginia Judge Declares Democrats' Redistricting Amendment Invalid
Select a version of the text written from a presumed ideological perspective. This is not the original text, but a hypothetical version — how someone with that viewpoint might have phrased it. Tapping the current version again will return to the original or select cleaned version.
A Virginia judge has ruled that the Democrats' proposed constitutional amendment to redraw congressional districts is invalid due to procedural violations.
A Virginia judge has ruled that a proposed constitutional amendment allowing Democrats to redraw the state's congressional districts is invalid due to procedural violations. Tazewell Circuit Court Judge Jack Hurley Jr. determined that the legislature failed to adhere to its own rules by introducing the amendment during a special session, did not approve the amendment before early voting commenced in the 2025 general election, and neglected to publish the amendment three months prior to the election as mandated by law.
Virginia House Speaker Don Scott announced plans to appeal the ruling, stating that Democrats remain committed to presenting the matter directly to voters. Virginians for Fair Elections, a campaign supporting the redistricting resolution, criticized the lawsuit's filing location, suggesting that Republicans sought a favorable jurisdiction.
This decision is part of a broader national discourse on mid-decade redistricting efforts. Republicans have pursued redistricting in states like Texas, Missouri, North Carolina, and Ohio, while Democrats have focused on California and Utah. Legal challenges to these initiatives are ongoing, and the outcomes remain uncertain.
Source
AP NewsRelated News
Fact-checking
Fact-check the facts of the article using external sources and databases.