Federal Judge Rules Against National Guard Deployment in Washington, D.C.
Select a version of the text written from a presumed ideological perspective. This is not the original text, but a hypothetical version — how someone with that viewpoint might have phrased it. Tapping the current version again will return to the original or select cleaned version.
A federal judge has ruled that President Trump's deployment of National Guard troops in Washington, D.C., was unlawful, citing overreach into local law enforcement authority.
A federal judge has ordered the Trump administration to end its months-long deployment of National Guard troops in Washington, D.C., ruling the action unlawful. U.S. District Judge Jia Cobb determined that the deployment infringed upon the District's authority over local law enforcement. The order is paused for 21 days to allow for an appeal.
The ruling stems from a lawsuit filed by D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb, who argued that the deployment undermined the city's autonomy and posed risks to public safety. Judge Cobb stated that the District's exercise of sovereign powers is irreparably harmed by the deployment.
In response, White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson asserted that President Trump acted within his lawful authority to deploy the National Guard to protect federal assets and assist law enforcement. She described the lawsuit as an attempt to undermine the President's efforts to reduce violent crime in D.C.
The deployment began in August after President Trump declared a "crime emergency" in the city, leading to over 2,300 National Guard troops from multiple states patrolling the capital. This legal decision adds to ongoing debates over the use of federal forces in domestic law enforcement roles.
Source
NPRFact-checking
Fact-check the facts of the article using external sources and databases.