仅事实
联邦法官阻止国民警卫队部署至波特兰
摘要
美国地方法官卡琳·伊默古特发布初步禁令，阻止联邦将国民警卫队部队部署到波特兰，理由是缺乏叛乱或执法无能的充分证据。
美国地方法官卡琳·伊默古特发布初步禁令，阻止联邦将国民警卫队部队部署到俄勒冈州波特兰，直到作出最终裁决。此裁决是在为期三天的审判后作出，并延长了即将到期的临时限制令。法官计划在本周末前作出最终决定。
在她长达16页的裁定中，伊默古特法官认定，将国民警卫队联邦化以应对波特兰美国移民与海关执法局设施外的抗议活动，违反了联邦法规和第十修正案。她未发现有可信的叛乱证据，也未发现地方执法部门无法执行联邦法律。法官指出，虽然存在零星暴力事件，但这些不足以构成叛乱或证明军事干预的合理性。
联邦政府辩称，部署国民警卫队是为了保护联邦财产和人员安全。然而，伊默古特法官认为证据不足以支持重大损害的说法，也未显示联邦官员无法履行职责。她还强调，负责ICE大楼安全的联邦保护服务副区域主管在联邦化命令发布前未被咨询，对此次动员感到意外。
俄勒冈州总检察长丹·雷菲尔德欢迎该裁决，称这是“迈向真相与问责的一步”。州长蒂娜·科特克也赞扬了这一决定，强调州的自治权。联邦政府已表示计划对该禁令提出上诉。
事实核查
使用外部来源和数据库核实文章的事实。
✓
Confirmed
U.S. District Judge Karin Immergut has issued a preliminary injunction preventing the federal deployment of National Guard troops to Portland, Oregon, until a final decision is made.
✓
Confirmed
This ruling follows a three-day trial and extends a previous temporary restraining order that was set to expire.
✓
Confirmed
The judge plans to deliver a final decision by the end of the week.
✓
Confirmed
In her 16-page order, Judge Immergut determined that the federalization of the National Guard to address protests outside the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility in Portland violated federal statutes and the 10th Amendment.
✓
Confirmed
She found no credible evidence of a rebellion or that local law enforcement was unable to enforce federal law.
✓
Confirmed
The judge noted that while there were isolated incidents of violence, they did not constitute a rebellion or justify military intervention.
✓
Confirmed
The federal government argued that the deployment was necessary to protect federal property and personnel.
✓
Confirmed