Judge orders reinstatement and back pay for former New York federal prosecutor Maurene Comey
Just the facts

Judge orders reinstatement and back pay for former New York federal prosecutor Maurene Comey

Select a version of the text written from a presumed ideological perspective. This is not the original text, but a hypothetical version — how someone with that viewpoint might have phrased it. Tapping the current version again will return to the original or select cleaned version.

Summary

A Manhattan federal judge ruled that the Department of Justice unlawfully terminated assistant U.S. attorney Maurene Comey and ordered her retroactive reinstatement with back pay.

A U.S. District Court judge in Manhattan ruled Monday that the Department of Justice’s termination of Maurene Comey, an assistant United States attorney in the Southern District of New York, was unlawful. Judge Jesse Furman ordered that Comey be retroactively reinstated to her position and receive back pay.

Comey, who had worked on cases involving Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Sean "Diddy" Combs, was dismissed in July 2025 and subsequently sued the DOJ. The judge rejected the department’s arguments that then-Attorney General Pam Bondi could fire a federal prosecutor "at will" and that current AG Todd Blanche could later ratify the action. Furman also rejected the claim that the Civil Service Reform Act allowed an attorney general to remove a prosecutor without cause, noting that the DOJ’s position would overturn longstanding Supreme Court precedent.

"This Court, however, is bound to follow the Supreme Court's precedents unless and until the Supreme Court overturns them," Furman wrote.

Comey’s attorneys described the ruling as a victory for civil servants and the rule of law, emphasizing that it upholds the constitutional system of checks and balances. The DOJ issued a statement indicating it disagrees with the decision and will appeal after the judge issues a final judgment. The court did not rule on Comey’s claim that her First Amendment rights were violated, granting her until Nov. 9 to submit arguments on that issue.

The White House has not yet commented on the ruling.

Source

CNBC

Keep reading — for free

Create a free account to follow the news. No card required.