Trump waives Russia sanctions amid bipartisan criticism
Just the facts

Trump waives Russia sanctions amid bipartisan criticism

Select a version of the text written from a presumed ideological perspective. This is not the original text, but a hypothetical version — how someone with that viewpoint might have phrased it. Tapping the current version again will return to the original or select cleaned version.

Summary

President Trump issued an executive order waiving parts of the Graham Act sanctions on Russia, prompting opposition from both Republican and Democratic lawmakers and concern from Ukraine.

President Trump signed an executive order on Friday that waives portions of the sanctions law passed under the Graham Act, citing a certification to Congress that the waiver serves U.S. national interests. The legislation, originally championed by the late Senator Lindsey Graham, was intended to pressure Russian officials and major oil and gas purchasers as part of the effort to end Russia's war in Ukraine.

Lawmakers from both parties have publicly condemned the move. GOP Senator Thom Tillis called the waiver "beyond irresponsible" and said the administration is "capitulating to a Russian dictator who illegally invaded Ukraine." Senator John Cornyn said Lindsey Graham would be "appalled" by the decision. Republican Representative Don Bacon described the action as prolonging the war, while Representative Michael McCaul urged the president to reconsider.

Democratic Representative Gregory Meeks, who opposed the original bill, said the president has had the authority to sanction Russia for years but lacks the will to use it. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer added that the waiver "gives the Russian economy life support."

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy expressed disappointment, noting that the waiver undermines the bipartisan support that led to the Graham Act's passage and benefits Russia.

The waiver follows a recent deal to import Russian diesel and earlier easing of energy sanctions, actions the administration says are aimed at lowering fuel prices ahead of the upcoming midterm elections. Critics argue the diesel purchases represent a small fraction of U.S. consumption and may not offset broader supply disruptions linked to the conflict in Iran.

Separately, concerns have been raised about degraded Starlink and Starshield services in Ukraine. Senators and representatives have called for a Defense Department inspector-general investigation into possible restrictions on these communications systems, which Ukraine says hampers its air-defense capabilities.

Source

CBS News

Keep reading — for free

Create a free account to follow the news. No card required.