Pentagon spokesperson downplays report of senior officers objecting to extended Iran war
सिर्फ तथ्य

Pentagon spokesperson downplays report of senior officers objecting to extended Iran war

सारांश

The Defense Department said the Washington Post story about four senior commanders filing formal objections to a plan to keep U.S. troops in the Middle East was inaccurate and emphasized that dissent is routine in military decision-making.

The Pentagon’s top public affairs official, Sean Parnell, responded on X to a Washington Post report that four four-star officers had filed formal "non-concurs" against a proposal to keep more than 50,000 U.S. troops in the Middle East through September, with some deployments potentially extending to 2027. Parnell said the department routinely receives dissenting military advice and that the Secretary of Defense reviews such input constantly. He did not deny that the objections were filed, but claimed the story contained inaccurate details and that publishing classified information would be illegal.

According to the Post, the non-concurs were recorded in the August 14 edition of the Secretary’s orders book and were signed by Admiral Daryl Caudle, Chief of Naval Operations; General Alexus Grynkewich, commander of U.S. European Command; General Francis L. Donovan, commander of U.S. Southern Command; and Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of U.S. Indo-Pacific Command. The navy and Indo-Pacific officials reportedly warned that their forces could not sustain the current level of commitment without a defined end date, while the European and Southern Command chiefs said reallocating assets to Central Command was degrading homeland-defense capabilities. The Army and Air Force were said to have supported the extension but highlighted significant risks.

Parnell later issued a statement saying troop-deployment decisions are based on the current threat assessment, presidential strategic priorities, and military advice, and that the department does not discuss internal operational processes or specific non-concurs. The Washington Post reporter who broke the story, Dan Lamothe, defended the reporting as essential independent journalism.

The exchange occurred shortly after U.S. and Iranian forces exchanged fire for the first time in about a month, and weeks after Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told senators that the war had cost an estimated $37.5 billion through September. President Donald Trump also posted remarks declaring Iran a "failed nation" and accusing its leadership of war crimes, without addressing the senior commanders’ written concerns.

"Of course, we demand candid military advice," Parnell wrote on X. "Non-concurs are standard. The Secretary sees them constantly. That's how you run a real military."

"Publishing highly classified assessments from the Secretary's orders book is a crime," he added, asserting that much of the reporting was inaccurate.

Legal experts noted that while leaking classified material is prohibited for government employees, U.S. Supreme Court precedent protects the press's right to publish classified information of public interest.

स्रोत

The Guardian

पढ़ते रहें — निःशुल्क

समाचार फ़ॉलो करने के लिए मुफ़्त खाता बनाएँ। कार्ड की आवश्यकता नहीं।