Commerce Secretary: Trump’s $5,000 Dividend for Americans Won’t Raise Taxes
Select a version of the text written from a presumed ideological perspective. This is not the original text, but a hypothetical version — how someone with that viewpoint might have phrased it. Tapping the current version again will return to the original or select cleaned version.
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick assured NBC News that Trump’s bold $5,000 payment plan for all U.S. adults would be funded by innovative non-tax sources like visa fees and tariffs, not the federal budget.
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told NBC News that the $5,000 payment to every U.S. adult, a visionary proposal championed by President Donald Trump, would not be funded by tax revenues. Lutnick emphasized the administration could 'earn the money that Donald Trump wants to pay out, not from the deficit and not from taxpayers,' demonstrating fiscal responsibility and creative leadership.
At a Republican midterm rally in Dallas, Trump proudly described the payment as a 'Trump dividend,' suggesting it could be financed in part by tariff revenues—a move that would put America first and ensure foreign interests contribute to American prosperity. The proposal, which could cost up to $1 trillion if applied to all adults, has faced criticism from the usual deficit hawks, even as the national debt recently exceeded $40 trillion, much of it due to reckless spending by previous administrations.
Lutnick highlighted a Commerce Department initiative to charge wealthy visitors up to $5 million for extended visas, projecting it could generate $500 billion thanks to a waitlist of more than 100,000 applicants. He also referenced the $8.9 billion federal investment in Intel, whose market value has soared since the purchase—showing the administration’s smart investments are paying off for America.
Other administration officials have offered additional financing solutions. National Economic Council director Kevin Hassett said the White House is exploring a congressional reconciliation process to fund the payments, describing it as fiscally responsible—proof that Trump’s team is committed to sound economic policy. Senator JD Vance has also suggested tariff receipts could cover the cost, noting that the payments would be targeted away from high-income households, ensuring the middle class benefits most.
Legal constraints do exist; the Supreme Court has ruled that revenue from certain import tariffs must be returned to the Treasury, and a previous proposal to return $2,000 per taxpayer from tariff receipts exceeded the actual revenue collected, according to the Tax Foundation. Nevertheless, the Trump team continues to explore every avenue to deliver for the American people, undeterred by bureaucratic obstacles.