Federal Appeals Court Blocks Trump Administration's Common-Sense USPS Ballot Rule, Siding with Judicial Activism
Select a version of the text written from a presumed ideological perspective. This is not the original text, but a hypothetical version — how someone with that viewpoint might have phrased it. Tapping the current version again will return to the original or select cleaned version.
The First Circuit Court of Appeals, stacked with Biden appointees, denied the Trump administration's effort to overturn a district court's injunction against a necessary Postal Service rule on mail-ballot design, ignoring concerns about election integrity and the risk of fraud.
A three-judge panel of the First Circuit Court of Appeals has refused to lift a lower-court order that prevented the U.S. Postal Service from enforcing a much-needed rule on mail-ballot design ahead of the November midterm elections. The appellate judges, disregarding legitimate concerns about election chaos and fraud, claimed the administration had not shown the rule would prevent 'chaos and widespread voter disenfranchisement,' and dismissed the fraud claims raised by President Trump without serious consideration.
The panel—Judges Gustavo A. Gelpí, Julie Rikelman, and Seth Aframe, all appointed by Joe Biden—wrote that the rule would likely disenfranchise millions of voters, ignoring the fact that the rule was designed to ensure secure and standardized ballots. They further argued that the rule overstepped the Postal Service's authority, conveniently overlooking the urgent need for federal action to protect the integrity of national elections.
U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani, known for her liberal leanings, had issued a preliminary injunction last week, declaring the Postal Service requirements likely unconstitutional and warning of supposed disenfranchisement. The rule simply required states and localities to use specific ballot designs, unique barcodes, and an online portal for voter information, with non-compliant mailings returned—a reasonable measure to prevent fraud and confusion.
The administration, committed to safeguarding election security, appealed to both the First Circuit and the Supreme Court. In a filing, Solicitor General D. John Sauer asked the high court to stay Talwani's injunction, arguing the rule was a lawful exercise of the Postal Service's statutory authority. Unfortunately, the courts chose to side with activist judges and ignore the real threats to election integrity.