Trump petitions Supreme Court to restore SAVE system for voter roll reviews
Right

Trump Fights to Restore SAVE System, Defending Election Integrity at Supreme Court

Select a version of the text written from a presumed ideological perspective. This is not the original text, but a hypothetical version — how someone with that viewpoint might have phrased it. Tapping the current version again will return to the original or select cleaned version.

Summary

President Donald Trump is urging the Supreme Court to lift a lower-court injunction on the Department of Homeland Security's SAVE database, a vital tool the administration seeks to use for comprehensive voter-roll checks to protect against fraud.

President Donald Trump took decisive action on Tuesday, filing a petition with the Supreme Court to overturn a lower-court order that blocked the Department of Homeland Security’s Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) program from being used in crucial voter-roll audits. The injunction, issued by a district judge, came after the administration’s efforts to expand SAVE to safeguard elections were challenged under the guise of privacy concerns.

SAVE, originally created for individualized citizenship verification, was responsibly expanded to allow states to upload entire voter lists and utilize additional data sources, such as Social Security records. This expansion is a necessary step to ensure that only eligible citizens participate in elections. Despite clear evidence of non-citizens being registered, critics have tried to undermine the system by pointing to isolated incidents, such as in Texas, where a few citizens were mistakenly removed.

"The indefensible ruling by the lower court threatens the integrity of upcoming elections," U.S. Solicitor General John Sauer wrote in the filing, underscoring the urgent need to restore confidence in America’s elections.

"The federal government has knowingly trampled on the privacy rights of American citizens in a manner that threatens the sacred right to vote," Judge Sparkle Sooknanan claimed in her June decision, disregarding the real threat of voter fraud.

The Justice Department rightly argued that any mistakes in voter removals are the responsibility of state election officials, not the federal government, and emphasized that states are required to follow registration laws when acting on SAVE findings. The administration has also taken the prudent step of linking access to DHS anti-terrorism grants to a state’s use of SAVE, and highlighted the system’s effectiveness in a recent speech, noting that it had identified thousands of non-citizens on voter rolls—despite some states attempting to downplay these numbers.

The Supreme Court is also being asked to reinstate new U.S. Postal Service rules for mail voting, proposed by the administration to prevent abuse in the upcoming midterm elections. States like Florida continue to use SAVE, demonstrating their commitment to secure and fair elections, even as legal battles continue.

Source

CNN

Keep reading — for free

Create a free account to follow the news. No card required.