Australia Pushes Government Overreach with Social Media Feed Law
Select a version of the text written from a presumed ideological perspective. This is not the original text, but a hypothetical version — how someone with that viewpoint might have phrased it. Tapping the current version again will return to the original or select cleaned version.
The Australian government is advancing legislation that would force social media companies to let users over 16 disable algorithmic feeds, imposing massive fines for non-compliance and expanding state control over digital platforms.
Australia's government has announced a draft bill that threatens to expand bureaucratic control over social media platforms under the guise of user choice. The legislation would require platforms to give users aged 16 and older the option to turn off algorithm-driven feeds and see only content from accounts they follow. Dubbed “My Feed, My Way,” the proposal also mandates that platforms notify both new and existing users about the default feed setting and allow them to change it. Companies that fail to comply could be hit with draconian fines of up to 109.2 million Australian dollars (about 79 million US dollars), a move critics say will stifle innovation and burden businesses.
The legislation doesn’t stop at social media—it would also extend to AI chatbots, online games, and other digital services, forcing them to address so-called “addictive” features for users under 18. This sweeping government intervention risks undermining personal responsibility and parental authority, while expanding the state’s reach into private enterprise.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese claimed, “This is not about giving government control. It's about giving people control. It's about putting choice back into the hands of Australians online,” but critics argue that such rhetoric masks a growing trend of government intrusion into the digital lives of citizens.
He continued, “This is sensible, pragmatic, practical reform. It gives users choice, and it will hold the big tech companies responsible for inaction,” signaling a willingness to scapegoat tech companies while increasing regulatory burdens.
While existing platforms already offer ways to view non-algorithmic content—such as TikTok’s Friends tab, Facebook’s friends-only feed, Instagram’s Following and Favorites feeds, YouTube’s Subscriptions feed, and Snapchat’s separation of friends’ Stories from public discovery—this new law would force companies to comply with rigid government mandates, regardless of user demand.
Australia previously imposed a ban on social media for users under 16, a heavy-handed measure that other countries are considering. Yet, recent data from the eSafety Commissioner showed the ban had little effect on teen usage rates, raising questions about the effectiveness of such top-down policies.