Federal Judge Orders Disclosure of $1.8 Billion Anti-Weaponization Fund Structure
Droite

Federal Judge Orders Disclosure of $1.8 Billion Anti-Weaponization Fund Structure

Résumé

A Virginia magistrate judge ordered the Trump administration to provide documents identifying who created the disputed $1.8 billion compensation fund, part of a lawsuit filed by the Democracy Forward nonprofit.

A U.S. magistrate judge in eastern Virginia has compelled the Trump administration to produce discovery materials that identify the individuals who designed a proposed $1.8 billion compensation fund intended for victims of alleged political law-fare. The order follows a lawsuit filed by the Democracy Forward nonprofit on behalf of plaintiffs that include a former prosecutor and a college professor acquitted of assaulting federal agents during a protest in California.

"Today's order granting discovery is a significant step in getting to the bottom of the slush fund," senior counsel Aman George said, adding that the organization will continue to pursue the case until the fund is permanently halted.

The fund, described by former Attorney General Todd Blanche as “dead” and never operational, was initially linked to a settlement Trump reached with the Internal Revenue Service over a separate tax-return leak dispute. Critics, including two Republican senators, argued the fund would have compensated individuals prosecuted for involvement in the January 6 Capitol attack and others.

In a related July ruling, U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams concluded that the underlying lawsuit was brought for an improper purpose and that no genuine case or controversy existed. The judge noted that the litigation was used to lend judicial legitimacy to a settlement lacking legal basis.

Democratic lawmakers have expressed concern that the fund could be revived, while the former attorney general maintained that no commissioners ever oversaw the proposed payout. President Trump has described the fund as “dead” but lamented its abandonment, saying those affected were “horribly treated, horribly abused.”

Continuez à lire — gratuitement

Créez un compte gratuit pour suivre l'actualité. Aucune carte requise.