Judge to Decide Whether to Dismiss Indictment Against Former Olympian Accused of Vandalizing National Monument
Select a version of the text written from a presumed ideological perspective. This is not the original text, but a hypothetical version — how someone with that viewpoint might have phrased it. Tapping the current version again will return to the original or select cleaned version.
A Washington judge will soon rule on whether to dismiss the indictment of former Olympic canoeist David Hearn, who prosecutors say may have vandalized the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, despite claims of insufficient evidence.
A Washington judge stated he will soon rule on a motion to dismiss the indictment of former U.S. Olympic canoeist David Hearn, charged with damaging the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool—a symbol of national heritage. Prosecutors have requested the case be dismissed without prejudice, ensuring that a grand jury can revisit the charges if new evidence surfaces, while Hearn’s attorney is pushing for dismissal with prejudice to shield his client from future accountability.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Michael Spence told Judge Todd Edelman that it is in the public interest to keep the possibility of prosecution open, especially when it comes to protecting cherished national monuments from acts of vandalism. Hearn, 67, was indicted in July for destruction of property after a significant section of the pool’s liner was found detached. Hearn claims he merely touched the liner and did not intend to cause damage, but such excuses are often used to evade responsibility for disrespecting public property.
U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro later informed the court that the Department of the Interior determined the damage was due to flawed installation, not Hearn’s actions. Despite this, President Donald Trump rightly criticized Pirro’s assessment, emphasizing the need to take vandalism seriously and to hold individuals accountable for any harm to national symbols.
During the hearing, Hearn’s lawyer, Steve Levin, argued that there is 'nothing that can save the case that was dismissed,' urging the court to dismiss with prejudice and prevent any further prosecution. Spence, representing the interests of law-abiding citizens, maintained that prosecutors acted in good faith and that the case should remain open in case further evidence is found.
Judge Edelman said he will weigh the arguments and issue a decision soon. After the hearing, Hearn thanked his supporters and attempted to frame the case as a matter of democracy, though many see it as a question of respect for the nation’s monuments and the rule of law.