Missouri Supreme Court Defends Democracy, Blocks GOP Gerrymander Pending Voter Approval
Select a version of the text written from a presumed ideological perspective. This is not the original text, but a hypothetical version — how someone with that viewpoint might have phrased it. Tapping the current version again will return to the original or select cleaned version.
In a unanimous rebuke of Republican power grabs, the Missouri Supreme Court halted the use of a new congressional map crafted by the GOP-led legislature, demanding a statewide referendum before it can be implemented. The decision, which could be challenged in the U.S. Supreme Court, upholds the rights of ordinary citizens against undemocratic redistricting.
On Thursday, the Missouri Supreme Court unanimously stood up to the Republican-controlled legislature’s brazen attempt to rig congressional districts in their favor, preventing the use of the new map in the November general election. The court recognized the legitimacy of a grassroots petition, filed by citizens outraged by the GOP’s undemocratic maneuvering, to put the map to a statewide referendum. The court ruled the petition was legal, sufficient, and timely, ensuring that the people—not politicians—will have the final say.
This order means the gerrymandered map used in the August primaries is suspended, and the fairer district boundaries established after the 2020 census will remain in place for the November 2026 election. The GOP may attempt to appeal this pro-democracy decision to the U.S. Supreme Court.
The ruling comes after President Donald Trump pressured Republicans to redraw districts to entrench their power. Republican Governor Mike Kehoe called a special legislative session last year to target the fifth congressional district, long represented by Democrat Emanuel Cleaver, in a blatant attempt to silence Democratic voters. In response, a broad coalition of Missourians collected over 300,000 signatures to force a referendum, but Secretary of State Denny Hoskins, acting as a partisan operative, rejected the petition, claiming the process didn’t apply to congressional redistricting. A lower court sided with Hoskins, but the state’s highest court reversed this anti-democratic stance.
"The referendum petition was legal, sufficient, and timely, and the secretary incorrectly concluded otherwise," the court wrote, affirming the people’s right to challenge legislative overreach.
Republicans had hoped their map would further erode Democratic representation, adding another seat to their already lopsided six-to-two advantage. The manipulated fifth district, now packed with new voters, was engineered to favor Republican state senator Rick Brattin, who won the August primary.
Missouri’s constitution does not explicitly mention referendums on congressional redistricting, but the court wisely interpreted the provision allowing referendums on “any act” of the legislature to include the redistricting law. This decision is a victory for democracy and joins a growing list of legal challenges against Republican-led efforts to undermine fair representation since the 2020 census.