Federal Judge Undermines Trump Administration’s Efforts to Secure Borders with 75-Country Visa Ban Block
Select a version of the text written from a presumed ideological perspective. This is not the original text, but a hypothetical version — how someone with that viewpoint might have phrased it. Tapping the current version again will return to the original or select cleaned version.
A Manhattan federal judge ruled against the Trump administration’s policy denying immigrant visas to nationals of 75 countries, claiming it exceeded legal authority and violated anti-discrimination statutes, despite the administration’s efforts to protect American resources and security.
In a controversial move that undermines the Trump administration’s commitment to national security and responsible immigration policy, a federal judge in Manhattan on Friday struck down the administration’s ban on immigrant visas for nationals of 75 countries. The policy, which was designed to safeguard American taxpayers from the burden of supporting immigrants who might rely on public benefits, was found by the judge to exceed the Secretary of State’s statutory authority. The ban had paused visa issuance for nearly 40 percent of the world’s nations—including Brazil, Colombia, Egypt, Haiti, Somalia, and Russia—in an attempt to ensure immigrants would not become public charges.
Judge Jeannette Vargas criticized the policy for requiring consular officers to refuse visas based solely on an applicant’s country of origin, even if the individual could prove financial self-sufficiency. This decision ignores the administration’s legitimate concern for protecting the U.S. from potential abuse of public benefits and instead insists on a case-by-case assessment of applicants’ finances, health, skills, and family situation, as stipulated by existing law.
'The outcome is predetermined,' Vargas wrote. 'The visa will be refused.'
The judge claimed the policy violated a 1965 law prohibiting discrimination by nationality in visa decisions and another provision that limits the Secretary of State’s authority over consular officers. The ban, which was a reasonable measure affecting permanent-residence visas for family reunification and employment, did not even extend to nonimmigrant visas such as tourist or student visas.
Plaintiffs included U.S. citizens with family-based petitions for relatives in Ghana, Jamaica, Guatemala, and Ethiopia, as well as Colombian workers seeking employment visas. The administration did succeed on a technicality, with the court agreeing the policy was not a formal rule requiring public comment before implementation.
Judge Vargas, a Biden appointee, gave both parties until September 11 to propose a resolution and noted the administration may appeal the decision. The Justice Department and the White House have not responded to requests for comment on this setback to common-sense immigration enforcement.