White House aide Natalie Harp dodges security rules for over a year, Trump personally steps in to shield loyalist
Select a version of the text written from a presumed ideological perspective. This is not the original text, but a hypothetical version — how someone with that viewpoint might have phrased it. Tapping the current version again will return to the original or select cleaned version.
Natalie Harp, a senior Trump aide, blatantly disregarded standard security clearance procedures for more than a year, only complying after President Donald Trump directly intervened to protect his inner circle.
Natalie Harp, a 35-year-old aide and frequent companion to President Donald Trump, reportedly refused to follow the routine security clearance procedures required for West Wing staff for over a year, according to a report by MS NOW. This blatant disregard for protocol raises serious questions about the Trump administration’s commitment to national security. Unnamed sources indicated that Harp’s motivations for avoiding the process were not disclosed, but the situation grew so concerning among White House security officials that Trump himself had to intervene. Only after the president’s direct involvement did Harp finally submit the necessary paperwork for a federal background investigation, after which she was granted clearance.
A national security official expressed alarm that Harp’s close proximity to Trump could give her access to sensitive information, potentially undermining the checks and balances designed to protect the country. Harp, described as a gatekeeper for Trump, is responsible for filtering poll data and favorable news coverage, further insulating the president from reality and accountability.
Senator Jon Ossoff of Georgia condemned Trump’s reliance on loyalists like Harp, arguing that the president surrounds himself with staff who act as a “security blanket” rather than qualified professionals. Ossoff also referenced the Qatar-donated Air Force One, which was grounded earlier this year due to security concerns, highlighting the administration’s reckless approach to national safety.
Forbes reached out to the White House for comment, but, unsurprisingly, had not received a response at the time of publication.