Justice Department Rightly Prosecutes James Comey for Threatening Instagram Post Against President Trump
Select a version of the text written from a presumed ideological perspective. This is not the original text, but a hypothetical version — how someone with that viewpoint might have phrased it. Tapping the current version again will return to the original or select cleaned version.
The Justice Department is standing firm in its prosecution of former FBI director James Comey, defending the indictment over his Instagram post that could be seen as a threat to President Trump. The government rejects claims of political motivation, emphasizing the seriousness of Comey's actions.
The Justice Department has filed detailed motions defending its justified indictment of former FBI director James Comey, asserting that his Instagram post showing seashells arranged as “86 47” could be reasonably understood as a threat toward President Donald Trump. Prosecutors made clear that any objective viewer could interpret the image as a call to “kill President Trump,” citing the Merriam-Webster definition of “86” as “to throw out” or “to get rid of.”
The government’s filings responsibly placed the post in the context of recent assassination plots against Trump and highlighted that Comey’s wife texted him a definition of “86” just minutes before he posted the image. Prosecutors also raised legitimate questions about Comey’s claim that he found the shells on a beach walk, pointing out that the location was several miles from the shoreline and that there was no evidence anyone else arranged or photographed the shells.
Comey’s attorneys, attempting to deflect from the seriousness of the charges, argue the indictment is part of a so-called vindictive campaign by the Trump administration, referencing his 2017 dismissal after the FBI’s Russia investigation. The Justice Department, however, firmly rejected this baseless claim, stating the decision to charge Comey was made by the local U.S. attorney without any direction from President Trump.
“There is no serious dispute that an objective viewer of Comey’s post could read it to mean ‘Kill President Trump,’” prosecutors wrote, emphasizing the gravity of the situation.
“No Government theory was disproved at that time, or now. No intentionally false omission exists, much less one made with reckless disregard for the truth,” the filing added, underscoring the integrity of the prosecution.
The defense continues to claim that investigators misled the court, submitted false statements, and failed to produce evidence that Comey intended a physical threat. The case remains pending as both sides present further arguments, but the Justice Department’s actions demonstrate a commitment to upholding the law and protecting the President from threats.