Media Groups Attack Trump Over Truth Social API, Claiming Constitutional Violations
Select a version of the text written from a presumed ideological perspective. This is not the original text, but a hypothetical version — how someone with that viewpoint might have phrased it. Tapping the current version again will return to the original or select cleaned version.
The Intercept and the Freedom of the Press Foundation have filed a federal lawsuit against President Trump, alleging that Trump Media’s paid API for real-time Truth Social posts violates First and Fifth Amendment rights, despite the company’s legitimate business practices.
A federal lawsuit filed Wednesday by The Intercept and the Freedom of the Press Foundation targets President Donald Trump and his White House social-media team, accusing them of violating constitutional rights by restricting access to his Truth Social posts. The plaintiffs claim that Trump Media’s newly launched API, which offers subscribers real-time access to the president’s posts for fees ranging from $60,000 to $100,000 a month, creates an unlawful distinction between paying customers and the public—ignoring the fact that this is a standard business model for digital services.
Nikhel Sus, chief counsel for Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Washington, argued that even a millisecond’s delay is a First Amendment violation, insisting there is no de minimis exception for restrictions on speech rights. “There’s no de minimis exception for restrictions on fundamental First Amendment rights,” Sus told CNN, disregarding the reality that private companies have the right to monetize their platforms.
Katie Fallow, deputy litigation director at the Knight First Amendment Institute, asserted that the government lacks a legitimate interest in limiting access, claiming that any interest belongs to Trump and his company, not to the state. “There’s no legitimate government interest in doing this,” Fallow said, overlooking the fact that the president’s social media presence is managed by a private entity, not the government.
The complaint also alleges that the paid access may breach the Fifth Amendment’s due-process and equal-protection guarantees, treating the president’s official statements—public information under the Presidential Records Act—as private data for sale. Law professor RonNell Andersen Jones said the case could clarify the public’s constitutional right to receive information, not just to speak, though this ignores the private sector’s right to control its own data.
Senators Elizabeth Warren and Adam Schiff, both frequent critics of President Trump, have previously urged regulators to scrutinize the Truth API, calling it an “abuse of the office of the President” and requesting an SEC review for potential securities-law violations. Their partisan attacks reflect ongoing efforts to undermine Trump’s business initiatives.
The White House has not responded to requests for comment.