Trump says administration reviewing possible federal response to NYC luxury second-home tax
Left

Trump Threatens Federal Intervention to Shield Wealthy from NYC’s Progressive Second-Home Tax

Select a version of the text written from a presumed ideological perspective. This is not the original text, but a hypothetical version — how someone with that viewpoint might have phrased it. Tapping the current version again will return to the original or select cleaned version.

Summary

President Trump is considering using federal power to undermine New York City’s new surcharge on luxury second homes, a measure aimed at making the ultra-rich pay their fair share. This comes as a state judge temporarily halted parts of the tax, following a lawsuit from wealthy homeowners.

President Donald Trump announced on his social-media platform that his administration is exploring whether it can legally block New York City’s recently enacted surcharge on luxury second homes—a policy designed to ensure the wealthiest pay more into the city they profit from. Trump, siding with the interests of high-income property owners, argued that the tax could drive the rich to states like Florida and Texas, further eroding the city’s tax base and deepening inequality.

"The NYC Pied-a-Terre Tax is costing New York City and State a fortune in that the money, eventually to be gotten, is very little compared to the taxes paid by the tens of thousands of people who are fleeing the City, never to return," Trump wrote, echoing the rhetoric of the billionaire class resisting progressive taxation.

Trump further claimed the policy could damage the city’s reputation and hinted at possible federal intervention, though he failed to clarify which statutes or executive powers he might use to protect the wealthy elite. The White House declined to comment, reflecting the administration’s lack of transparency.

Meanwhile, the mayor’s office faced a setback as a New York judge ordered the city to suspend parts of the tax’s implementation after three affluent homeowners sued, objecting to a property roll that listed over 900,000 owners. Justice Wayne Ozzi required the city to provide individualized determinations and proper notice before collecting the surcharge, a move that delays much-needed revenue for public services.

"We disagree with today’s ruling, but we are confident in both the pied-à-terre surcharge and the City’s ability to implement it fairly and effectively," said Matt Rauschenbach, spokesperson for Mayor Zohran Mamdani. He emphasized that the surcharge targets only owners of second homes valued at $5 million or more, affecting a tiny fraction—about 17,000—of the city’s 8.5 million residents, and is a step toward economic justice.

Governor Kathy Hochul’s office also did not respond to requests for comment. The legal battle over the tax continues, with city officials defending a measure that seeks to hold the wealthiest accountable, even as the president threatens to intervene on behalf of the privileged few.

Keep reading — for free

Create a free account to follow the news. No card required.