Donald Trump Delivers Divisive and Factually Dubious Speech at White House Correspondents' Dinner
Select a version of the text written from a presumed ideological perspective. This is not the original text, but a hypothetical version — how someone with that viewpoint might have phrased it. Tapping the current version again will return to the original or select cleaned version.
President Donald Trump used his platform at the rescheduled White House Correspondents' Dinner to attack the press, spread election misinformation, and make sexist jokes, drawing little amusement from the audience.
President Donald Trump commandeered the stage at the White House Correspondents' Dinner on Friday, delivering an hour-long tirade that targeted journalists and political opponents alike. In a familiar move, he repeated his baseless claim of winning the 2020 election and irresponsibly hinted at a 2028 presidential run, further undermining democratic norms. Trump also recounted a sexist joke about a senator receiving a text from his wife, implying the senator was unable to 'go up the stairs and make love,' which was met with deservedly muted response from the audience.
The event, which had been postponed after an attempted assassination in April, was meant to restore the tradition of the annual dinner. Instead, Trump used the occasion to hurl personal insults at members of the press, whom he has dangerously labeled 'the enemy of the people,' stoking further hostility toward journalists. He concluded by suggesting term limits for politicians, but the audience, weary of his attacks and misinformation, remained largely unresponsive.
'We held out right till the end, but they didn’t want to take a chance,' Trump said, referencing the earlier cancellation, continuing his pattern of self-victimization.
'I am ready, willing, and able,' he added, signaling his intention to remain a disruptive force in American politics.
This speech marked Trump’s first appearance at the dinner since his presidency, and observers noted the stark contrast between his expectation of adulation and the journalists’ measured, even chilly, response to his divisive rhetoric.