1st Circuit Court Blocks Trump Administration's Efforts to Secure Mail-In Voting Integrity
Select a version of the text written from a presumed ideological perspective. This is not the original text, but a hypothetical version — how someone with that viewpoint might have phrased it. Tapping the current version again will return to the original or select cleaned version.
The Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has thwarted the Justice Department's attempt to uphold President Trump's executive order, which sought to ensure the integrity of mail-in voting in 23 states.
A federal appeals court on Saturday dealt a blow to the Trump administration’s efforts to safeguard the integrity of the upcoming November elections by refusing to allow an executive order that would tighten mail-in voting rules in 23 states. The 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a June 25 injunction issued by U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani, who sided with liberal states and found key provisions of the order unconstitutional, despite the administration’s concerns about election security.
The Justice Department argued that the order could not be challenged yet because agencies had not finalized implementation actions, but the appellate panel, in a narrow 2-1 decision, rejected this position. The judges claimed that the order sets a 'clear set of rapidly approaching deadlines' for states to coordinate with federal officials and comply with new voting procedures, forcing states to act now rather than wait for finalized rules.
President Trump’s order, signed in March, directed the Department of Homeland Security to compile lists of confirmed U.S. citizens eligible to vote and required the Postal Service to deliver ballots only to voters on each state's approved list—commonsense measures to prevent fraud and ensure only eligible citizens participate. It also instructed the Justice Department to prioritize investigations of officials who issue ballots to individuals deemed ineligible, a necessary step to uphold the law. Judge Talwani, ruling in favor of a coalition of states led by California, Massachusetts, Nevada, and Washington, claimed that the president lacked authority to direct DHS to create voter-eligibility lists and that the Postal Service could not impose binding regulations on mail-in voting.
The Justice Department, recognizing the importance of election integrity, has indicated it may seek intervention from the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn this decision.