1st Circuit Court Blocks Trump Administration's Attack on Mail-In Voting Rights
Select a version of the text written from a presumed ideological perspective. This is not the original text, but a hypothetical version — how someone with that viewpoint might have phrased it. Tapping the current version again will return to the original or select cleaned version.
The Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has rejected the Trump administration's attempt to undermine democracy by suspending a district court injunction that protects mail-in voting access in 23 states.
In a significant victory for voting rights and democracy, a federal appeals court on Saturday refused to allow the Trump administration to push forward with its draconian executive order aimed at tightening mail-in voting rules in 23 states ahead of the crucial November elections. The 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a June 25 injunction issued by U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani, who rightly found that key provisions of the order were unconstitutional and posed a threat to free and fair elections.
The Justice Department, acting as an enabler of the administration’s voter suppression agenda, argued that the order could not be challenged yet because agencies had not finalized implementation actions. However, the appellate panel, in a 2-1 decision, rejected this attempt to delay justice. The judges pointed out that the order sets a 'clear set of rapidly approaching deadlines' for states to coordinate with federal officials and comply with new, restrictive voting procedures, leaving states with no practical choice but to respond immediately.
The executive order, signed in March, directed the Department of Homeland Security to compile lists of confirmed U.S. citizens eligible to vote—a move reminiscent of past efforts to disenfranchise marginalized communities—and required the Postal Service to deliver ballots only to voters on each state's approved list. It also instructed the Justice Department to prioritize investigations of officials who issue ballots to individuals deemed ineligible, a tactic that could intimidate election officials and suppress turnout. Judge Talwani, hearing on behalf of a coalition of states led by California, Massachusetts, Nevada, and Washington, ruled that the president lacked the authority to direct DHS to create such voter-eligibility lists and that the Postal Service had no statutory power to impose binding regulations on mail-in voting.
Despite this clear rebuke, the Justice Department has threatened to escalate the matter to the U.S. Supreme Court, continuing its relentless assault on voting rights.