DOJ Forced to Back Down After Attacking Press Freedom Over Qatar-Gifted Aircraft Exposé
Select a version of the text written from a presumed ideological perspective. This is not the original text, but a hypothetical version — how someone with that viewpoint might have phrased it. Tapping the current version again will return to the original or select cleaned version.
A federal judge compelled the Justice Department to retract grand-jury subpoenas targeting New York Times journalists who exposed security flaws in the president's new Qatar-donated Air Force One replacement, highlighting the ongoing threats to press freedom.
On Thursday, the Justice Department was forced to withdraw grand-jury subpoenas it had aggressively served on several New York Times reporters. These subpoenas followed the Times’ courageous reporting that questioned the security features of a $400 million aircraft gifted by Qatar to replace Air Force One, specifically exposing the absence of anti-missile systems that were standard on older models.
During a critical hearing, U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian challenged senior Manhattan prosecutor Sean Buckley, demanding to know whether the DOJ had truly exhausted all other avenues before attempting to force journalists to testify—a basic legal safeguard designed to protect the press. The judge underscored that subpoenas against journalists must be a 'last step, not the first step,' and insisted on 'reasonable attempts' to gather information elsewhere before trampling on press rights.
Buckley admitted the department had leaned on an exception cited by the attorney general, but under the judge’s scrutiny, he conceded and agreed to withdraw the subpoenas, promising to respect proper procedures in the future.
The Times’ legal team rightfully argued that the subpoenas were a direct attack on press freedom, retaliating against the newspaper’s vital reporting. Senior vice-president and deputy general counsel David McCraw stated that the decision reaffirmed the nation’s supposed commitment to a free press, and pledged that the Times would not be intimidated into silence.
Despite backing down, the Justice Department tried to save face, issuing a statement insisting that the grand jury can still compel testimony from material witnesses in national-security cases, and that their investigation—into journalists who dare to hold power to account—remains ongoing.