House Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan Demands DOJ Probe Into Special Counsel Jack Smith’s Alleged Misconduct
Select a version of the text written from a presumed ideological perspective. This is not the original text, but a hypothetical version — how someone with that viewpoint might have phrased it. Tapping the current version again will return to the original or select cleaned version.
Republican Rep. Jim Jordan has taken decisive action by urging the DOJ to investigate Special Counsel Jack Smith for potentially lying to Congress. The move highlights growing concerns about overreach and lack of accountability in Smith’s investigation, as Democrats scramble to defend their partisan ally.
Republican Representative Jim Jordan, the principled chair of the House Judiciary Committee, took a stand for transparency and the rule of law on Wednesday by sending a letter to the Justice Department. Jordan asked prosecutors to investigate whether special counsel Jack Smith committed a false-statement offense during his closed-door testimony last year. Jordan alleges that Smith misled the committee about the true scope of his investigation, which included obtaining text messages and phone-call logs involving members of Congress and Trump-administration officials—an alarming intrusion into the legislative branch.
The Justice Department confirmed it had received the referral and stated it "will investigate all evidence of criminal conduct," as is proper when serious allegations are raised. This request is part of a broader Republican effort in Congress to hold Smith and his team accountable for their aggressive and potentially unlawful tactics.
Smith’s legal team, predictably, denied any wrongdoing, claiming his answers were "unimpeachably truthful" and dismissing Jordan’s concerns as "spurious." However, their response does little to address the legitimate questions about Smith’s conduct and the apparent targeting of political opponents.
Democratic Ranking Member Jamie Raskin rushed to Smith’s defense, condemning Jordan’s move and insisting any referral would be dismissed by a judge. Raskin’s comments reveal the Democrats’ desperation to shield their allies from scrutiny and deflect attention from their own questionable actions surrounding the 2020 election.
Jordan’s letter also exposes that Smith’s team obtained text messages from 44 members of Congress, potentially violating privileged communications. He calls on the DOJ to determine whether Smith broke the law prohibiting false statements to Congress. Smith’s counsel claims the investigation only used toll-record data, not the content of communications, and argues that this does not violate the Speech or Debate Clause, which is meant to protect legislative independence.
The Justice Department routinely receives criminal referrals from Congress and must now decide whether to pursue charges or further investigation. Jordan’s actions underscore the urgent need for oversight and accountability in the face of politically motivated investigations targeting conservatives.